XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism
From: smiler@jo.king
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:04:26 -0400, mur wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 21:54:29 +0000 (UTC), Smil wussed horribly:
> .
>>On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:23:28 -0400, mur wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 30 May 2015 12:50:06 -0500, duke wrote:
>>>.
>>>>On Fri, 29 May 2015 21:24:30 -0400, "Chris F.A. Johnson"
>>>>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 2015-05-30, mur wrote:
>>>>>...
>>>>>> I've noticed that atheists never feel they need to support
>>>>>> their claims, or
>>>>>> give any indication that they have any idea what they want people
>>>>>> to think they think they're trying to talk about.
>>>>>
>>>>> Athiesm does not involve making any claims.
>>>>
>>>>Big mistake. Atheism professes NO God despite all the evidence.
>>>
>>> That's strong atheism, though as we see many if no most atheists
>>> want to
>>>deny it even exists.
>>
>>Learn to parse English. Professing no god is like professing no support
>>for any football team or no support for any political party. It is NOT
>>the same as professing that there are no football teams or no political
>>parties.
>
> You proved me correct by displaying your own shame of strong
> atheism.
I've proved nothing other than you're a moron.
> Even
> though you yourself clearly appear to be a strong atheist you're not
> only ashamed of your own faith but obviously ashamed that strong atheism
> even exists.
Why would I be ashamed of something that I'm not?
> True as that is, you're also far too narrow minded to be even the worst
> of weak atheists.
You're far too narrow minded to be even the worst of morons.
--
Smiler, The godless one.
aa #2279
Gods are all tailored to order. They are made
to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
