XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism   
   From: smiler@jo.king   
      
   On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 14:04:18 -0400, mur wrote:   
      
   > On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 22:09:06 +0000 (UTC), Smil had no clue at all:   
   > .   
   >>On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:23:36 -0400, mur challenged Smil:   
   >>   
   >>> On Sat, 30 May 2015 21:14:45 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   >>> .   
   >>>>On Fri, 29 May 2015 20:45:35 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 19:44:10 +0000 (UTC), Smil wrote:   
   >>>>> .   
   >>>>>>On Fri, 22 May 2015 12:04:08 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 9 May 2015 22:07:13 +0000 (UTC), Smil  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>>>On Fri, 08 May 2015 22:02:03 -0400, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:46:59 -0500, Mitchell Holman   
   >>>>>>>>>    
   >>>>>>>>> wrote:   
      
      
      
   >>>>>>>>>>  So you don't believe in evolution   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>     Prevent your supposed evidence of that.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Was that meant to be English?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>     Would you like people to think you're truly too stupid to   
   >>>>>>>     figure out the   
   >>>>>>> mistake I made.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>but you also believe your god is influencing it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>  Most odd.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>     You can't comprehend the basic possibility that God   
   >>>>>>>>>     infuenced evolution.   
   >>>>>>>>> Other people can.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>What god would that be?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>     If there's a God associated with Earth it's obvious that   
   >>>>>>>     people have   
   >>>>>>> different beliefs about him and refer to him in different ways.   
   >>>>>>> You for example have great faith that he doesn't exist and refer   
   >>>>>>> to him as "what god".   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>The one you admit that you have no evidence for?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>     Present your quote(s) or be exposed as a liar.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I wrote that I would accept: "The exact same objective evidence that   
   >>>>>>persuaded _you_ that your supposed god character exists."   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>You replied: "There is none"   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     I'm not persuaded that God does exist. Like you I consider the   
   >>>>>     possibility that he doesn't. But unlike you I can also consider   
   >>>>>     the   
   >>>>> possibility that he does,   
   >>>>   
   >>>>On what evidence?   
   >>>   
   >>>     What have I told you about that?   
   >>   
   >>No answer.   
   >   
   >     Since you have no clue what I told you before how could it be   
   >     different if I   
   > tell you again?   
   >   
   >>>>That someone, several millennia ago, thought up the idea of a god and   
   >>>>it caught on?   
   >>>>Do you also consider the possibility that all the other 20,000+ known   
   >>>>gods exist?   
   >>>   
   >>>     What have I told you about that?   
   >>   
   >>No answer.   
   >   
   >     Since you have no clue what I told you before how could it be   
   >     different if I   
   > tell you again?   
   >   
   >>>>Or the possibility that leprechauns exist?   
   >>>   
   >>>     What have I told you about that?   
   >>   
   >>No answer.   
   >   
   >     Since you have no clue what I told you before how could it be   
   >     different if I   
   > tell you again?   
      
   You again confirm that you have NO EVIDENCE.   
   Yet you stupidly 'think' that I will believe without evidence.   
   What a moron you are.   
      
   --   
   Smiler, The godless one.   
   aa #2279   
   Gods are all tailored to order. They are made   
   to exactly fit the prejudices of the believer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)