Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 88,639 of 89,766    |
|    & to Your Government    |
|    warning unsafe message dont open re : Lo    |
|    14 Mar 17 09:22:08    |
      XPost: alt.religion.mormon, sac.politics, alt.homosexual       XPost: soc.men       From: ampersand.the.great@gmail.com               fake flooding from drug dealer scum posting junk messages to hide       behind traffic they steal your credit card numbers too its from peter j       ross greg hall and alt usenet kooks report identity thieves and pirates       to fbi . i win                            On 03/13/2017 10:46 PM, Your Government wrote:       > The question discussed is how far crossgenerational sexual relations       > with or by minors could be considered to be a gay rights issue. The       > author discusses the issue from the perspective of general principles       > found in the case-law of the European Court on Human Rights. These       > principles suggest that the basic right to privacy should be       > interpreted as providing comprehensive protection of the right of       > children and adolescents to sexual self-determination, namely both       > the right to effective protection from (unwanted) sex and abuse on       > the one hand and the right to (wanted) sex on the other. The analysis       > is based upon the findings of natural and social science as well as       > an extensive international survey of national legal provisions and it       > leads to the conclusion that consensual sexual relations of and with       > adolescents over 14 (out of relations of authority) should be       > qualified a gay rights issue; likewise (as the exception to the rule)       > the possibility of filtering out cases from prosecution where a       > contact/relation is proven (beyond reasonable doubt) as consensual       > and harmless even though the minor involved is under 14. The       > legalization of (objectively consensual) sexual relations with       > persons under 14 as such, however, should not be considered to be a       > gay rights issue.       >       > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10482330       >       >                     --              i am & the great . i win              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca