Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 88,641 of 89,766    |
|    Turin Turd to All    |
|    Re: warning unsafe message dont open re     |
|    14 Mar 17 16:17:06    |
      XPost: alt.religion.mormon, sac.politics, alt.homosexual       XPost: soc.men       From: dumbfuck@dumbo.com              On 14/03/2017 13:22, & wrote:       >       > fake flooding from drug dealer scum posting junk messages to hide       > behind traffic they steal your credit card numbers too its from peter j       > ross greg hall and alt usenet kooks report identity thieves and pirates       > to fbi . i win       >       >       >       > On 03/13/2017 10:46 PM, Your Government wrote:       >> The question discussed is how far crossgenerational sexual relations       >> with or by minors could be considered to be a gay rights issue. The       >> author discusses the issue from the perspective of general principles       >> found in the case-law of the European Court on Human Rights. These       >> principles suggest that the basic right to privacy should be       >> interpreted as providing comprehensive protection of the right of       >> children and adolescents to sexual self-determination, namely both       >> the right to effective protection from (unwanted) sex and abuse on       >> the one hand and the right to (wanted) sex on the other. The analysis       >> is based upon the findings of natural and social science as well as       >> an extensive international survey of national legal provisions and it       >> leads to the conclusion that consensual sexual relations of and with       >> adolescents over 14 (out of relations of authority) should be       >> qualified a gay rights issue; likewise (as the exception to the rule)       >> the possibility of filtering out cases from prosecution where a       >> contact/relation is proven (beyond reasonable doubt) as consensual       >> and harmless even though the minor involved is under 14. The       >> legalization of (objectively consensual) sexual relations with       >> persons under 14 as such, however, should not be considered to be a       >> gay rights issue.       >>       >> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10482330       >>       >>       >       >        >       “&” is an infamous and anonymous internet troll. He launches       scurrilous, defamatory, trivializing and false diatribes against       Men’s Rights activists and their posts and against Men’s Rights       organizations. He therefore, has as his goals the disruption of       soc.men and the thwarting of the legitimate goals of the men’s       rights movement, and the denigration, trivialization and discrediting       of the leaders of the men’s rights movement and men’s rights       organizations.              FOAD TURIN you moron              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca