Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 88,691 of 89,766    |
|    Nancy Pelosi Is Also Guilty to All    |
|    Hillary's Latest Scandal: She And Bill S    |
|    09 Jun 17 03:05:19    |
      XPost: alt.journalism.gonzo, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.greens       XPost: nm.general       From: investigate.pelosi@cnn.com              Scandal: A new investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary       Clinton took in at least $100 million from Middle East leaders.       Can such a financially and ethically compromised candidate truly       function as our nation's leader?              The investigation by the Daily Caller News Foundation has       uncovered a disturbing pattern of the Clintons' raising money       for the Clinton Foundation from regimes that have checkered       records on human rights and that aren't always operating in the       best interests of the U.S. By the way, the $100 million we       mentioned above doesn't appear to include another $30 million       given to the Clintons by two Mideast-based foundations and four       billionaire Saudis.              All told, it's a lot of money.              "These regimes are buying access," Patrick Poole, a national       security analyst who regularly writes for PJ Media, told the       DCNF. "You've got the Saudis. You've got the Kuwaitis, Oman,       Qatar and the UAE (United Arab Emirates). There are massive       conflicts of interest. It's beyond comprehension."              Well, maybe not, given that Clinton, during her four-year tenure       as secretary of state, used a clearly illegal private email       server which is now under investigation by the FBI. Her open e-       mail system likely was hacked by Chinese, Russian and perhaps       other spy agencies, say cyberespionage experts. Such negligence       would seem to disqualify her from ever holding a sensitive       foreign policy post in the government again.              Meanwhile, former U.S. Attorney Joseph E. diGenova told the       Caller that he believes the FBI has launched a second, possibly       more serious investigation into possible political corruption       involving the Clinton Foundation. This is potentially explosive,       given that the Clintons seem to have run their charity in a way       that lines their own pockets.              The question is an open one: Did the oil-rich Mideast nations       give lavishly to the Clinton Foundation in an effort to       influence future U.S. policy? And what about Bill Clinton's       business partnership with Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum,       Dubai's authoritarian ruler, from 2003 to 2008? Clinton took       away some $15 million in "guaranteed payments" from the deal,       his tax records show.              A picture of extraordinary greed is emerging from both Clintons       in the years after they hold the highest posts in the U.S.       government.              In just the past three years, after her stint as the nation's       top diplomat, Hillary Clinton spoke to dozens of deep-pocket       firms on Wall Street, typically charging $250,000 a pop to hear       her wit and wisdom -- despite her bitter condemnations of Wall       Street during her campaign.              All told, she took in an estimated $22 million from these       speeches -- an extraordinary amount, given the growing consensus       among foreign-policy thinkers that Clinton was one of the worst       secretaries of state ever.              So why would Arab potentates and Wall Street magnates alike pony       up so much money for the Clintons? Is it because they believe so       strongly in the philanthropic mission of the Clinton Family       Foundation? Or is it that they hoped to have influence on a       future Hillary Clinton presidency, which would of course feature       First Gentleman Bill Clinton?              Remember, a Hillary Clinton presidency once looked like a sure       thing. Now, given the growing possibility that she could be       charged for criminal negligence for putting secret material on a       private server, or perhaps even be charged with corruption,       Clinton has far more serious problems than just getting elected.       Her biggest problem may be staying out of prison.              http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/hillarys-latest-       scandal-she-and-bill-siphoned-100-mil-from-persian-gulf-leaders/                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca