XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: klausschadenfreude@null.net   
      
   On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 20:31:34 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   Sherman) wrote:   
      
   >Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >> ...   
   >>Says the guy who- until I schooled his ignorant ass this morning-- has   
   >>no idea that "innocent until proven guilty" was a Constitutionally   
   >>protected right.   
   >> ...   
   >   
   >You said it was in the Constitution, comrade.  It is not.   
      
   No, I didn't say it was in the Constitution.   
      
   If you could read-- which you obviously cannot-- you will see I said:   
      
   >>>>>>But you are against the Constitution and assuming innocence until   
   >>>>>>proven guilty.   
      
   See that "and" in there? Please tell me I don't have to define that   
   for you as well.   
      
   But, I DID tell you it was a constitutionally protected right. That   
   frightened you, because you immediately snipped it from your replies.   
      
   I proved it-- citing the relevant court cases. Again, snip snip snip.   
      
   Your fear and hatred of the Constitution is palpable.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)