XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: governor.swill@gmail.com   
      
   On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:44:14 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:35:56 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >Sherman) wrote:   
   >   
   >>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:25:29 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>> ....   
   >>>>>You've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck about the *Republican*   
   >>>>>speaker of the house.   
   >>>>> ...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>But you are for defending child molesters.   
   >>>   
   >>>But you are against the Constitution and assuming innocence until   
   >>>proven guilty.   
   >>   
   >>Could you cite which section of the Constitution you're referring to?   
   >   
   >It's no surprise that you're not familiar with the Constitution. And   
   >it's also no surprise you need to feign ignorance of the hallowed   
   >concept of innocence before being proven guilty.   
   >   
   >What's wrong with your people, exactly?   
   >   
      
   Apparently the same thing as you since you're unable to quote what   
   part of the Constitution he's crossing.   
      
   Swill   
   --   
   "Bungled collusion is still collusion." -- Charles Krauthammer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)