XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: governor.swill@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:58:27 -0500, "Scout"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >news:9e1l0dlm8rerhmpmsleq12c9v4i9av5dvs@4ax.com...   
   >> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:21:08 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:16:14 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>> ...   
   >>>>>Allegations DISMISSED.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Not by the *Republican* Speaker of the House.   
   >>>   
   >>>You've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck about the *Republican*   
   >>>speaker of the house.   
   >>>   
   >>>The FACT is that "eye witness" accounts from almost 40 years ago are   
   >>>worthless.   
   >>   
   >> What about handwriting from forty years ago?  Seems the idiot signed   
   >> the yearbook of one of his teenage victims under a message about how   
   >> beautiful she was.   
   >   
   >Well, shit, if that isn't proof of rape, I can't image what would be enough   
   >evidence.   
      
   Nothing to do with rape or sexual misconduct.  However, assuming the   
   handwriting is his (which hasn't been demonstrated yet) it proves only   
   that he lied about not knowing her.   
      
   >That's even assume he wrote it. But let's say he did.   
   >   
   >What does that prove. I mean really prove?   
   >   
   >That he can't remember some minor event from decades ago?   
   >   
   >I suppose everyone without a eidetic memory is now a closet rapist?   
   >   
   >What was the name of the waitress who last served you breakfast?   
   >   
   >If having an imperfect memory is proof of a crime, then you should have no   
   >problems answering.   
      
   "I don't recall" is a pol's stock in trade.  Look how many times   
   Sessions has said it to Congress.  And then media reports "refreshed"   
   his memory.   
      
   Swill   
   --   
   The difference between being ruled by a central government   
   or the 1% is that the government is ultimately answerable   
   to the voters - the 1% are answerable to no one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)