XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: governor.swill@gmail.com   
      
   On Tue, 14 Nov 2017  "Scout" wrote:   
   >"Governor Swill"  wrote   
   >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 "Scout" wrote:   
   >>>"Bradley K. Sherman"  wrote   
   >>>> Scout  wrote:   
   >>>>>Agreed. Why is it that it seems like all sorts of crimes now have no   
   >>>>>statute of limitations on them?   
   >>>> Another right-wing nutjob supporting child molestation.   
   >>>No, explain to me why for 7 long years this fully legal adult said   
   >>>NOTHING.....   
   >> For the same reasons child sexual abuse is not reported.  The victims   
   >> aren't usually believed and the agony they endure going through a   
   >> trial process, which usually acquits the perpetrator, aren't worth it.   
   >   
   >   
   >Well, then, they shouldn't be expected to be listened too after waiting even   
   >longer......   
      
   Why not?  Isn't it funny that the rightists in here make just as many   
   excuses for Republicans' sexual misbehavior as leftists did for Bill   
   Clinton.  Can you say h-y-p-o-c-r-i-s-y?   
      
   >If you wouldn't speak up then.....your creditability factor is a whole lot   
   >less now unless you have PHYSICAL evidence to support your claim.   
      
   There usually isn't any physical evidence and you know that.  That's   
   why so many men get away with stuff like date rape.  The physical   
   evidence doesn't prove rape, it only proves sex.  Further, at the time   
   these things happened, DNA testing wasn't available so even if a 16   
   year old did show up at the hospital requesting a rape kit, the only   
   thing that prove would be that some guy busted a nut in her.   
      
   There's no such thing as physical evidence for coercive or non   
   consensual sex unless the rapist also smacks her around enough to   
   leave marks.  And even then, all he has to tell the jury is, "She   
   asked me to hit her.  She said it made it more exciting."   
      
   >Say a sealed letter you wrote at the time, or some other sort of substantive   
   >support for the claim. Oh, and someone else alleging to support the   
   >allegations is just piling more assertions on top of another assertion.   
      
   In which case you'd be complaining she had set up blackmail and/or   
   your same argument would be made.  That she should have reported it.   
      
   No, I'm not buying your view.  Moore is a racist and a man of such   
   foul character that his colleagues in Alabama threw him off the bench   
   not once, but twice.   
      
   Swill   
      
   --   
   The difference between being ruled by a central government   
   or the 1% is that the government is ultimately answerable   
   to the voters - the 1% are answerable to no one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)