XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: governor.swill@gmail.com   
      
   On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:02:04 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:54:22 -0500, Governor Swill   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 05:05:07 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:58:27 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:21:08 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:16:14 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>>>Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>Allegations DISMISSED.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Not by the *Republican* Speaker of the House.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>You've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck about the *Republican*   
   >>>>>speaker of the house.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>The FACT is that "eye witness" accounts from almost 40 years ago are   
   >>>>>worthless.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>What about handwriting from forty years ago?  Seems the idiot signed   
   >>>>the yearbook of one of his teenage victims under a message about how   
   >>>>beautiful she was.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>HOLY FUCK!   
   >>>   
   >>>Guilty of rape!   
   >>>   
   >>>ROFLMAO   
   >>   
   >>You want to make up things to claim I said, entertain yourself.  I   
   >>never accused him of rape, only pointed out the sexual misconduct   
   >>allegations that have appeared.   
   >   
   >Well nobody is arguing THAT.   
   >   
   >> The signed yearbook isn't proof of   
   >>even that.  What it is proof of is that he lied when he said he didn't   
   >>know her.   
   >   
   >No, that's not "proof" of anything. You remember everyone you've run   
   >across over the last 40 years?   
   >   
   >   
   >> I'm sure she's changed a lot in forty years and though he   
   >>doesn't remember her, she apparently remembers him.  Perhaps the   
   >>yearbook inscription (if it turns out to be genuine) will refresh his   
   >>memory.   
   >   
   >Maybe she does. Maybe she doesn't.   
      
   Clearly she does.  As for his memory, even if the yearbook entry is   
   true and refreshed his memory, he must continue to deny the   
   allegations because he failed to be forthcoming from the start.   
      
   "I am not a crook."   
      
   Swill   
   --   
   The difference between being ruled by a central government   
   or the 1% is that the government is ultimately answerable   
   to the voters - the 1% are answerable to no one.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)