XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: klausschadenfreude@null.net   
      
   On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:43:19 -0500, Governor Swill   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 05:02:04 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 19:54:22 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 05:05:07 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:58:27 -0500, Governor Swill   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 06:21:08 -0800, Klaus  Schadenfreude   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:16:14 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>>>>Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>Allegations DISMISSED.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Not by the *Republican* Speaker of the House.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>You've mistaken me for someone who gives a fuck about the *Republican*   
   >>>>>>speaker of the house.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>The FACT is that "eye witness" accounts from almost 40 years ago are   
   >>>>>>worthless.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>What about handwriting from forty years ago?  Seems the idiot signed   
   >>>>>the yearbook of one of his teenage victims under a message about how   
   >>>>>beautiful she was.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>HOLY FUCK!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Guilty of rape!   
   >>>>   
   >>>>ROFLMAO   
   >>>   
   >>>You want to make up things to claim I said, entertain yourself.  I   
   >>>never accused him of rape, only pointed out the sexual misconduct   
   >>>allegations that have appeared.   
   >>   
   >>Well nobody is arguing THAT.   
   >>   
   >>> The signed yearbook isn't proof of   
   >>>even that.  What it is proof of is that he lied when he said he didn't   
   >>>know her.   
   >>   
   >>No, that's not "proof" of anything. You remember everyone you've run   
   >>across over the last 40 years?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> I'm sure she's changed a lot in forty years and though he   
   >>>doesn't remember her, she apparently remembers him.  Perhaps the   
   >>>yearbook inscription (if it turns out to be genuine) will refresh his   
   >>>memory.   
   >>   
   >>Maybe she does. Maybe she doesn't.   
   >   
   >Clearly she does.   
      
   Clearly enough for YOU, perhaps.   
      
   > As for his memory, even if the yearbook entry is   
   >true and refreshed his memory, he must continue to deny the   
   >allegations because he failed to be forthcoming from the start.   
   >   
   >"I am not a crook."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)