XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.politics.republicans
From: governor.swill@gmail.com
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 14:53:42 -0800, Rudy Canoza
wrote:
>On 11/18/2017 12:55 PM, de chucka wrote:
>> On 19/11/2017 7:45 AM, Governor Swill wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:06:25 -0500, "Scout"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>> news:1gop0dhgf4t76l6ko9lfc9fmc0r3hh9r5t@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:41:23 -0500, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:981l0d9gsl1trd5og9ijcuo3v7mi9mip2s@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:55:15 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Four women, 26 corroborating witnesses. No statute
>>>>>>>>>>>> of limitation in child molesting.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If it was important to them, they'd have reported it immediately.
>>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>>> didn't. They're most likely lying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There are four women 26 corroborating witnesses. In Alabama
>>>>>>>>>> they keep this shit quiet for powerful men.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of COURSE they did. All of them. Four women and 26 witnesses.
>>>>>>>>> None of
>>>>>>>>> them said anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thirty-eight years ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's very typical of child molestation cases. Especially
>>>>>>>> in small towns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Spousal and child abuse, especially sexual abuse, remains very
>>>>>>> underreported. Typically such complaints aren't prosecutable anyway
>>>>>>> if there's no physical evidence. Even then, it's his word against
>>>>>>> hers. Most women don't want to go through the ordeal necessary to
>>>>>>> prosecute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet they are willing to make the accusations decades later?
>>>>>
>>>>> They know there will be no prosecution, no trial to endure and maybe,
>>>>> just maybe, they'll come out of it with enough bucks to pay their
>>>>> counsel. But more likely, they see this as a chance to get revenge.
>>>>
>>>> Or, maybe, the person they are accusing will chose to sue them for
>>>> slander
>>>> and hold them accountable for their allegations?
>>>>
>>>> Further as a politician who lives by their reputation, I doubt he
>>>> would even
>>>> need to establish harm in order to bring the suit.
>>>>
>>>> Because if you're going to publically make the allegation....you can
>>>> be held
>>>> legally accountable for it unless you can prove it's true in a court
>>>> of law.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Revenge. Another characteristic of those who fail to live up to their
>>> own standards.
>>>
>>> And what if the allegations are true? What if they can be proven to a
>>> jury's satisfaction? Such a law suit brings terrible risks with it.
>>
>> Problem of course is that the civil level of proof for both sides is lower,
>>
>> I can't understand why people on this ng aren't more outraged by his
>> total disrespect for the US constitution
>
>People on this newsgroup are outraged by his total disrespect for the
>Constitution, upchucka - just not any of the right-wingnut knuckle-draggers.
Agreed. Moore is a religious wacko who thinks the Bible should
supercede the Constitution in matters of law.
Swill
--
DNC issues are presented as equivalent to criminal allegations
against Donny and friends. The problem is nothing in the Democrat
kertuffle is alleged to be illegal. However unsavoury it
sounds, it's Democrats fighting with Democrats and doesn't
involve the general public. The allegations against Donny
and friends do involve crimes against the people of the
republic. - Siri Cruise
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
