XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net   
      
   "Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   news:93d11d5rsnpmu8v2kiu1mpeu6hppvrhg3n@4ax.com...   
   > On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:12:30 -0500, "Scout"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>news:2nop0dlb4k3l44uk3jdct3pc63mvbl6nbq@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 00:23:08 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:a8qk0dtg1dboochmhi63sm5gvi63p8cph3@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:54:55 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Bradley K. Sherman"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>news:ou3296$pm2$1@reader2.panix.com...   
   >>>>>>> Scout  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>Agreed. Why is it that it seems like all sorts of crimes now have no   
   >>>>>>>>statute   
   >>>>>>>>of limitations on them?   
   >>>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Another right-wing nutjob supporting child molestation.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>No, explain to me why for 7 long years this fully legal adult said   
   >>>>>>NOTHING.....   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> For the same reasons child sexual abuse is not reported.  The victims   
   >>>>> aren't usually believed and the agony they endure going through a   
   >>>>> trial process, which usually acquits the perpetrator, aren't worth it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Well, then, they shouldn't be expected to be listened too after waiting   
   >>>>even   
   >>>>longer......   
   >>>>   
   >>>>If you wouldn't speak up then.....your creditability factor is a whole   
   >>>>lot   
   >>>>less now unless you have PHYSICAL evidence to support your claim.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Say a sealed letter you wrote at the time, or some other sort of   
   >>>>substantive   
   >>>>support for the claim. Oh, and someone else alleging to support the   
   >>>>allegations is just piling more assertions on top of another assertion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Yup.  Piling on, hoping for a bit of revenge against the perp.   
   >>   
   >>Ah, so you can prove that he's guilty then?   
   >   
   > Why do you insist on making up stuff you wish I'd said so you can make   
   > the argument you want to make instead of the argument that is   
   > relevant.   
      
   So how do you know it's revenge against the perp, rather than a self serving   
   lie?   
      
   > I have made no such claim.  I cannot prove the allegations nor do I   
   > care to.  I expect Moore to be elected and will sit back and enjoy the   
   > hypocrisy of the religious right as they seat him in Washington.   
   >   
   >>....or are we simply accepting unsupported accusations of events from   
   >>decades ago, that magically appeared just weeks before the election?   
   >   
   > Much like you accepted allegations about Bill Clinton (who at least   
   > preferred adults) in the nineties.   
      
      
   Ok, prove the allegation you just made.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)