XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: governor.swill@gmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:55:58 -0500, "Scout"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >news:9s611ddpmg92308dllgdo9rs63grg54dg7@4ax.com...   
   >> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:06:25 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>news:1gop0dhgf4t76l6ko9lfc9fmc0r3hh9r5t@4ax.com...   
   >>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:41:23 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>news:981l0d9gsl1trd5og9ijcuo3v7mi9mip2s@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:55:15 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>>>> Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.   
   >>>>>>>>Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Four women, 26 corroborating witnesses.  No statute   
   >>>>>>>>>>>of limitation in child molesting.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>If it was important to them, they'd have reported it immediately.   
   >>>>>>>>>>They   
   >>>>>>>>>>didn't. They're most likely lying.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>There are four women 26 corroborating witnesses.  In Alabama   
   >>>>>>>>>they keep this shit quiet for powerful men.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Of COURSE they did. All of them. Four women and 26 witnesses. None of   
   >>>>>>>>them said anything.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Thirty-eight years ago.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>That's very typical of child molestation cases.  Especially   
   >>>>>>>in small towns.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Spousal and child abuse, especially sexual abuse, remains very   
   >>>>>> underreported.  Typically such complaints aren't prosecutable anyway   
   >>>>>> if there's no physical evidence.  Even then, it's his word against   
   >>>>>> hers.  Most women don't want to go through the ordeal necessary to   
   >>>>>> prosecute.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Yet they are willing to make the accusations decades later?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They know there will be no prosecution, no trial to endure and maybe,   
   >>>> just maybe, they'll come out of it with enough bucks to pay their   
   >>>> counsel.  But more likely, they see this as a chance to get revenge.   
   >>>   
   >>>Or, maybe, the person they are accusing will chose to sue them for slander   
   >>>and hold them accountable for their allegations?   
   >>>   
   >>>Further as a politician who lives by their reputation, I doubt he would   
   >>>even   
   >>>need to establish harm in order to bring the suit.   
   >>>   
   >>>Because if you're going to publically make the allegation....you can be   
   >>>held   
   >>>legally accountable for it unless you can prove it's true in a court of   
   >>>law.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Revenge.  Another characteristic of those who fail to live up to their   
   >> own standards.   
   >   
   >Revenge?   
   >   
   >And if it's just self serving demonization?   
      
   So what?  Charlie Rose just got fired and PBS canceled distribution of   
   his shows.   
      
   Sooner or later, the saturation point is going to hit when we realize   
   that sexual 'misbehavior', isn't a right thing or a left thing, it's a   
   male thing.  Maybe then we can drop the character assassination and   
   work on policy.   
      
   >> And what if the allegations are true?  What if they can be proven to a   
   >> jury's satisfaction?  Such a law suit brings terrible risks with it.   
      
   >Well then all the more reason for it to go to court.   
      
   Easy for you to say.  You aren't risking your own tail.  Filing suit   
   just keeps the story on top and Moore doesn't want that.   
      
   >And if they have the proof....why aren't they filing civil suits and   
   >presenting their evidence in court?   
      
   For the same reasons Moore doesn't want to file.  Who knows what a   
   jury will do?   
      
   It's a risk not worth taking.   
      
   Swill   
      
   --   
   DNC issues are presented as equivalent to criminal allegations   
   against Donny and friends. The problem is nothing in the Democrat   
   kertuffle is alleged to be illegal. However unsavoury it   
   sounds, it's Democrats fighting with Democrats and doesn't   
   involve the general public. The allegations against Donny   
   and friends do involve crimes against the people of the   
   republic. - Siri Cruise   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)