XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.politics.republicans
From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net
"Governor Swill" wrote in message
news:8sn81dltc79hgei83rh3d5a518j6g1h1u0@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:55:58 -0500, "Scout"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>news:9s611ddpmg92308dllgdo9rs63grg54dg7@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:06:25 -0500, "Scout"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>news:1gop0dhgf4t76l6ko9lfc9fmc0r3hh9r5t@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:41:23 -0500, "Scout"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Governor Swill" wrote in message
>>>>>>news:981l0d9gsl1trd5og9ijcuo3v7mi9mip2s@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:55:15 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
>>>>>>>>>Sherman) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Four women, 26 corroborating witnesses. No statute
>>>>>>>>>>>>of limitation in child molesting.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>If it was important to them, they'd have reported it immediately.
>>>>>>>>>>>They
>>>>>>>>>>>didn't. They're most likely lying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>There are four women 26 corroborating witnesses. In Alabama
>>>>>>>>>>they keep this shit quiet for powerful men.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Of COURSE they did. All of them. Four women and 26 witnesses. None
>>>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>>>them said anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Thirty-eight years ago.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That's very typical of child molestation cases. Especially
>>>>>>>>in small towns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Spousal and child abuse, especially sexual abuse, remains very
>>>>>>> underreported. Typically such complaints aren't prosecutable anyway
>>>>>>> if there's no physical evidence. Even then, it's his word against
>>>>>>> hers. Most women don't want to go through the ordeal necessary to
>>>>>>> prosecute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yet they are willing to make the accusations decades later?
>>>>>
>>>>> They know there will be no prosecution, no trial to endure and maybe,
>>>>> just maybe, they'll come out of it with enough bucks to pay their
>>>>> counsel. But more likely, they see this as a chance to get revenge.
>>>>
>>>>Or, maybe, the person they are accusing will chose to sue them for
>>>>slander
>>>>and hold them accountable for their allegations?
>>>>
>>>>Further as a politician who lives by their reputation, I doubt he would
>>>>even
>>>>need to establish harm in order to bring the suit.
>>>>
>>>>Because if you're going to publically make the allegation....you can be
>>>>held
>>>>legally accountable for it unless you can prove it's true in a court of
>>>>law.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Revenge. Another characteristic of those who fail to live up to their
>>> own standards.
>>
>>Revenge?
>>
>>And if it's just self serving demonization?
>
> So what?
And that right there says it all.
I mean who cares about the consequences to an innocent man. Who cares if she
ruins his life or his career?
So what? Right?
Talk to Brian Banks, I'm sure he will be more than happy to tell you what
such a false accusation meant to him. A loss of a major career, years spent
in jail, years more on strict custody parole, and a young man's life ruined
by her lies.
To which you say, "So what?".
Clearly you have NO consideration at all for the innocent lives that can be
ruined by such false accusations, and your total unwillingness to even
consider that the accusation could be anything less than the utter truth no
matter the consequences.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
