XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.republicans   
   From: me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net   
      
   "Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   news:1ntc1dd9v85kbphb56vo5jbrep17heg7tj@4ax.com...   
   > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:04:46 -0500, "Scout"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>news:8sn81dltc79hgei83rh3d5a518j6g1h1u0@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:55:58 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:9s611ddpmg92308dllgdo9rs63grg54dg7@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:06:25 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>news:1gop0dhgf4t76l6ko9lfc9fmc0r3hh9r5t@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:41:23 -0500, "Scout"   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>"Governor Swill"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>news:981l0d9gsl1trd5og9ijcuo3v7mi9mip2s@4ax.com...   
   >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:55:15 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley   
   >>>>>>>>> K.   
   >>>>>>>>> Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley   
   >>>>>>>>>>>K.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Sherman) wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Four women, 26 corroborating witnesses.  No statute   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>of limitation in child molesting.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>If it was important to them, they'd have reported it   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>immediately.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>They   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>didn't. They're most likely lying.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>There are four women 26 corroborating witnesses.  In Alabama   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>they keep this shit quiet for powerful men.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Of COURSE they did. All of them. Four women and 26 witnesses.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>None   
   >>>>>>>>>>>of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>them said anything.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>Thirty-eight years ago.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>That's very typical of child molestation cases.  Especially   
   >>>>>>>>>>in small towns.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Spousal and child abuse, especially sexual abuse, remains very   
   >>>>>>>>> underreported.  Typically such complaints aren't prosecutable   
   >>>>>>>>> anyway   
   >>>>>>>>> if there's no physical evidence.  Even then, it's his word against   
   >>>>>>>>> hers.  Most women don't want to go through the ordeal necessary to   
   >>>>>>>>> prosecute.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Yet they are willing to make the accusations decades later?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> They know there will be no prosecution, no trial to endure and   
   >>>>>>> maybe,   
   >>>>>>> just maybe, they'll come out of it with enough bucks to pay their   
   >>>>>>> counsel.  But more likely, they see this as a chance to get revenge.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Or, maybe, the person they are accusing will chose to sue them for   
   >>>>>>slander   
   >>>>>>and hold them accountable for their allegations?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Further as a politician who lives by their reputation, I doubt he   
   >>>>>>would   
   >>>>>>even   
   >>>>>>need to establish harm in order to bring the suit.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Because if you're going to publically make the allegation....you can   
   >>>>>>be   
   >>>>>>held   
   >>>>>>legally accountable for it unless you can prove it's true in a court   
   >>>>>>of   
   >>>>>>law.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Revenge.  Another characteristic of those who fail to live up to their   
   >>>>> own standards.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Revenge?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>And if it's just self serving demonization?   
   >>>   
   >>> So what?   
   >>   
   >>And that right there says it all.   
   >   
   > Yeah, it does.  This isn't about some wannabe Senator in Alabama.   
   > Charlie Rose was fired from CBS and lost his retirement from PBS.   
   > There're all kinds of stories breaking on "sexual assault".   
      
   And naturally they are all true, and every single man accused is utterly   
   guilty, all the time, every time.   
      
   Right?   
      
   Hell, why bother with courts? If an accusation is made, then it has to be   
   true, and that person needs to be immediately thrown in jail. No need for   
   trials either since the accusation proves your guilt.   
      
   Yea, and then you question why anyone, absolutely anyone would dare to   
   question unsupported accusations.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)