Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,167 of 89,766    |
|    Intelligent Party to All    |
|    Health Clubs Are An Essential Activity -    |
|    11 Oct 20 09:56:33    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc       XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans       From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com              I don't have a moral mandate, but after seeing 24 Hour Fitness and Gold's Gym,       2       of the largest health clubs chains in the industry, declare bankruptcy, I am       appalled. I declare we should at least just keep paying club dues, to keep our       clubs alive. If the Health Club industry actually MAKES money off of this, by       saving on operating costs during COVID, we'll BUILD the health club industry,       which WANTS. At least say you can quit the club without penalty, and get your       membership back after COVID, without penalty, but OTHERWISE they'll keep       charging       you. So it's like a donation, but you have to care, to not donate. This is a       club, not an a la carte restaurant. While other than that, I don't have a       moral       mandate, here are some of my thoughts:              Some people need to exercise to stay healthy. They may be recovering from       physical therapy and have more serious health issues which require exercise.        That       this point, is not factored in, at least for them, is an abominable error, but       everyone needs exercise, and we don't all have home gyms.              People eating and drinking, and talking with their masks off at restaurants and       commercial parties, are the ones certainly spreading COVID. Commercial indoor       entertainment which requires masks off, should probably be stopped in every       State.        So you could be in a movie theater with no popcorn, no food, and no drink,       wearing a mask, social distanced. This would be safer than a bar or a       restaurant       where people talk and socialize face to face while eating and drinking with       their       masks off, likely spewing spit in each other's faces. (A drive-in theater,       with a       drive-thru restaurant, would be better though, and as to a comparison to the       office...). And then their COVID laced plates are bused by the busboy.              Why isn't there a map, showing every new case of COVID - at least the street,       if       not address, and where they likely picked it up. What if several people had       gotten COVID at a certain store, wouldn't it make you think maybe the       ventilation       wasn't sufficient there, and you wouldn't shop there, reducing the number of       COVID       cases?              Outdoors masks off, or indoors masks on - which is safer?              I understand OUTDOOR restaurants are open for one reason and one reason only,       and       that is the $899 Billion dollar industry that employs 10% of the workforce, and       makes up 4% of U.S. GDP, $889 Billion/$20 Trillion = 4.5%. 15 million people       are       employed by the restaurant industry, while nationwide there the number of total       tax returns in the United States in all industries was 110 Million full-time,       and       160 million including part time.              If the switch to all take-out was made, what would be the effect on the       economy?              Waiters and busboys aren't producing equity anyways. It's not a product, but a       service! Like paying a whore vs. a porn star. At least we'll have those       Pornos       forever.              After Shelter-In-Place was over, California was 6 weeks with no masks on, at       Restaurants and Bars and Commercial Parties, where they drink beer, with masks       off, and now the Governor wants to fuck with the gyms and churches.              Gyms could enact extra safety measures, such as stationary equipment 6' or 12'       or       25' apart, and be inspected for fresh air and ventilation. Churches can       obviously       hold services outdoors with masks, and 6' apart (but not so much when the snow       comes in other States), but they certainly don't have to, and have the       prerogative       to make that call themselves.              People using gyms are moving around, and more likely healthy. People in       Churches,       are more conscientious, and likely to wear their masks correctly; unlike an NFL       stadium, and unlike a drunken bar or commercial party.              I note no one advised Churches everywhere across the country, to just hold       services outside, all this time, or at a park. Governors have every right to       advise, and plead with churches to modify their activities, however well or       mal-founded their notions may be, unless the Churches tell them to stop       harassing;       and no one, has any more right, to threaten or force Churches, nor private       parties, than I have a right to threaten or force anyone. The stupidest thing       in       the world is to be inside without a mask on, for non-essential activities, in a       room with someone you will not even talk to.              Healthclubs should be open, and strongly cautioned against, yet those who       choose       to use them, should be monitored for Coronavirus, so we find out if it is       spreading among those who use clubs at all, and continue monitoring unless       COVID       is ever gone. So healthclub patrons can be guineapigs, and we'll see. So a       big       point would be: have you used a healthclub in the past so many days/weeks, for       anyone who tests positive. I would not be surprised if it is not spreading       there       at all.              Some people need to exercise to stay healthy. They may be recovering from       physical therapy and have more serious health issues which require exercise.        That       this point, is not factored in, at least for them, is an abominable error, but       everyone needs exercise, and we don't all have home gyms.              People eating and drinking, and talking with their masks off at restaurants and       commercial parties, are the ones certainly spreading COVID.                     Biggest question besides the above, is personal services: hair salons, nail       salons, waxing, tattoo and piercing parlors, non-medicinal massages.              So then are those activities going to be outside too? Should every place have       some sort of super fresh air machines we produce now? Are there air purifiers       that could filter out COVID? Is outside really going to be safe?              It's been 6 months, we have to make this sustainable, without putting our       lives at       too great of risk. It could be 6 years.                            What's with open up the economy as soon as COVID's reduced, and let it spread       again, just to close it again? It would have to be eradicated for 3-4 months       or       it will just start spreading again.              WE HAVE TO GO TO SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS, AND AREN'T THE EAT-IN RESTAURANTS ALL       TO       BLAME? How do we know? How do we know where it's spreading? We don't have       better tracking of this?              New York and New Jersey, were apparently succeeding better than California,       even       though they had eat-in restaurants, but they have since for some reason fallen       substantially.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca