XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans   
   From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com   
      
   Maybe someone meant to say "invasion," and not "insurrection."   
      
      
   According to the dictionary, it looks like the "act" has to be violent.  If   
   some   
   violence occurred, is not an excuse to stereotype the 99% who did not support   
   such   
   violence.  Only that one person, then, would be involved in an "insurrection."   
      
   It wasn't an insurrection, whether someone meant to say insurrection or not.    
   If   
   they did mean to say insurrection, they're a liar, or in grave error.  That lie   
   persists in the Media today.   
      
   Thought precedes action.  Good thought precedes good action. Bad though   
   precedes   
   bad action.  That it was an "insurrection," is a thought; preceding police   
   action.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)