Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,340 of 89,766    |
|    Intelligent Party to All    |
|    Humanitarian Aid To Afghanistan, Conting    |
|    04 Sep 21 12:17:44    |
      XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc       XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans       From: Intelligent@savetheworldmsn.com              $5 Billion dangling carrot.              The former Afghanistan government was getting $5 billion already, but much of       it       military aid. Switch it to humanitarian and industrialization aid, IF AND ONLY       IF, the Taliban agree to recognize human rights. They could come to us with       this       deal, or we could come to them with it.                     (This is in addition to the $50-$100 billion the U.S. was spending itself on       the       war effort there... somehow. According to Brown University. Did we pay for       all       of NATO? $50Bill/10,000 NATO soldiers = $5,000,000 a soldier, per year?       https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2019/09/12/the-annual       cost-of-the-war-in-afghanistan-since-2001-infographic/?sh=3464d6fb1971       https://web.archive.org/web/20191008052643/https://www.thebalanc       .com/cost-of-afghanistan-war-timeline-economic-impact-4122493       https://web.archive.org/web/20191008000716/https://watson.brown.       du/costsofwar/files/cow/imce/papers/2018/Crawford_Costs%20of%20W       r%20Estimates%20Through%20FY2019.pdf       )              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca