XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, talk.philosophy.humanism   
   XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, alt.buddha.short.fat.guy   
   From: dalton@nfld.com   
      
   On Feb 22, 2023, David Dalton wrote   
   (in article<0001HW.29A5F5850032906470000225738F@88.198.57.247>):   
      
   > As of 0300 UTC February 22, 2023, homo sapiens globally has   
   > split, in terms of sexual compatibility and tendency to associate   
   > (DNA adjustments will come later), into 55 equal human species.   
   > As part of this, some abusive romantic relationships have   
   > been split across species boundaries. The remaining   
   > abusive romantic relationships have been made optimally   
   > sexually compatible (see below).   
   >   
   > As of 0623 UTC February 22, 2023,   
   > the sexual harmonics of 22% of humans have been adjusted   
   > for better (usually optimal) sexual compatibility. This has   
   > affected 57% of committed relationships. The remaining   
   > 43% can be broken up into 22% who were already optimally   
   > sexually compatible, 14% who were and remain partially   
   > sexually compatible, and 7% who have been broken up   
   > (all of whom who were incompatible and/or were in   
   > abusive relationships, though some abusive relationships   
   > were made optimally sexually compatible). Of course   
   > I am pulling these numbers out of my... perineum. :-)   
      
   Some incompatible relationships were made optimally   
   sexually compatible. But in the case of platonic   
   gay--lesbian parenting relationships not including   
   at least one a.s.r. which have lasted at least the   
   last 15 years without a breakup of more than a week   
   and/or have resulted in at least one child (of the two)   
   under 16, including adoptive or fetus, if each has at least   
   one same sex partner then they have become   
   bim--bif, which is partially compatible (less than   
   optimally compatible and less likely to stick).   
      
   Also there is one more case of breakup. If a   
   partially compatible or incompatible relationship   
   including at least one a.s.r. (assisted shaktipat   
   recipient) has not lasted at least the last five   
   years without a breakup of more than a week   
   and neither partner is a parent of at least one   
   child under 16, including adoptive or fetus,   
   there was no adjustment, and they are broken   
   up, since a.s.r. no longer have partial compatibility.   
   This seems to apply to Joe and Jill Biden, and   
   I have suggested new matches for them on   
   the “various matches” thread on alt.religion.druid .   
      
   But what about the platonic gay--lesbian example   
   above, where each has at least one same sex   
   partner, say another gay and another lesbian,   
   but with at least one partner an a.s.r., and   
   meeting the 5 years and/or child under 16   
   criteria? They can’t become bim--bif as   
   above since they the a..s.r. no longer have   
   partial compatibility. So in this example   
   the 2gays+2lesbians would have become   
   bim-+bim+bimT+straight-type-2-F   
   or   
   straight-type-2-M+bifT+bif+bif   
   who are all optimally compatible in both cases.   
      
   My Eight Sexual Harmonics matchmaking theory is   
   described on a subpage of my Salmon on the Thorns   
   webpage.   
      
   Note that optimal compatibility leads to longer   
   lifespans than partial compatibility which in   
   turn leads to longer lifespans (especially for the   
   deceived, if any) than incompatibility. (There   
   is no longer one-way attraction, so there   
   should no longer be any deception.)   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   "I gave my love a golden feather/I gave my love a heart of stone/and when you   
   find a golden feather/it means you'll never lose your way back home." (R.R.)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)