Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.atheism    |    Debate about the validity and nature of    |    89,766 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 89,646 of 89,766    |
|    Eli Kesef to All    |
|    3/10 Friday Fossile Day!    |
|    15 Dec 23 00:47:54    |
      From: nastyhorsefork@gmail.com              Bs"d              So-called "science" has lied to the general public for over 100 years with the       lie that the fossil record supports the theory of evolution. But the facts       show the complete opposite. New species appear suddenly in the fossil record,       without any connection        to supposed ancestors. And then species remain entirely the same throughout       their entire existence in the fossil record, with no or very minor changes.              This completely undermines the theory of evolution and is a firm confirmation       of the creation story in the book of Genesis, which says that all species are       created according to their nature.              The evolutionist lies about the fossil record were finally exposed by two       brave fossil experts Gould and Eldredge.              Below are some quotes from scientists who have their say on the fossil record.              All quotes are from experts in their field; fossil experts, (paleontologists)       and/or biologists. Without exception, they are all evolutionists, so these       quotes cannot be dismissed as "inexpert nonsense from religious people."              Here are the facts about the fossil record and the theory of evolution. Open       your eyes and see!              "Chicago Field Museum, Prof. of Geology, Univ. of Chicago, "A large number of       highly trained scientists outside the field of fossil science and evolutionary       biology have unfortunately been left with the impression that the fossil       record is much more        Darwinian than it actually is.       This is probably due to the over-simplification that is inevitable in sources       that are not first-hand: poor quality textbooks, popular articles, etc.       What probably also plays a role is: "the wish is the father of the thought"       In the years after Darwin, his followers hoped to find predictable progress.       This has generally not happened, but optimism is not easily eradicated, ***       and pure fantasy has ended up in textbooks ***.              One of the ironies of the creationism-evolutionism debate is that creationists       have accepted the erroneous view that the fossil record shows detailed and       orderly progress and have gone to great lengths to integrate this "fact" into       their deluge."              Raup, David, "Geology" New Scientist, Vol. 90, p.832,1981              David Raub is an evolutionist, and Professor Emeritus (former Sewell L. Avery       Distinguished Service Professor) in Geophysical Sciences and former Curator of       Geology at the Field Museum of Natural History at the University of Chicago.       see here: http://www.       palaeos.com/Evolution/People1.html              For more see here: https://tinyurl.com/Fossil-eng              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca