home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.atheism      Debate about the validity and nature of      89,766 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 89,646 of 89,766   
   Eli Kesef to All   
   3/10 Friday Fossile Day!   
   15 Dec 23 00:47:54   
   
   From: nastyhorsefork@gmail.com   
      
   Bs"d   
      
   So-called "science" has lied to the general public for over 100 years with the   
   lie that the fossil record supports the theory of evolution. But the facts   
   show the complete opposite. New species appear suddenly in the fossil record,   
   without any connection    
   to supposed ancestors. And then species remain entirely the same throughout   
   their entire existence in the fossil record, with no or very minor changes.   
      
   This completely undermines the theory of evolution and is a firm confirmation   
   of the creation story in the book of Genesis, which says that all species are   
   created according to their nature.   
      
   The evolutionist lies about the fossil record were finally exposed by two   
   brave fossil experts Gould and Eldredge.   
      
   Below are some quotes from scientists who have their say on the fossil record.   
      
   All quotes are from experts in their field; fossil experts, (paleontologists)   
   and/or biologists. Without exception, they are all evolutionists, so these   
   quotes cannot be dismissed as "inexpert nonsense from religious people."   
      
   Here are the facts about the fossil record and the theory of evolution. Open   
   your eyes and see!   
      
   "Chicago Field Museum, Prof. of Geology, Univ. of Chicago, "A large number of   
   highly trained scientists outside the field of fossil science and evolutionary   
   biology have unfortunately been left with the impression that the fossil   
   record is much more    
   Darwinian than it actually is.   
   This is probably due to the over-simplification that is inevitable in sources   
   that are not first-hand: poor quality textbooks, popular articles, etc.   
   What probably also plays a role is: "the wish is the father of the thought"   
   In the years after Darwin, his followers hoped to find predictable progress.   
   This has generally not happened, but optimism is not easily eradicated, ***   
   and pure fantasy has ended up in textbooks ***.   
      
   One of the ironies of the creationism-evolutionism debate is that creationists   
   have accepted the erroneous view that the fossil record shows detailed and   
   orderly progress and have gone to great lengths to integrate this "fact" into   
   their deluge."   
      
   Raup, David, "Geology" New Scientist, Vol. 90, p.832,1981   
      
   David Raub is an evolutionist, and Professor Emeritus (former Sewell L. Avery   
   Distinguished Service Professor) in Geophysical Sciences and former Curator of   
   Geology at the Field Museum of Natural History at the University of Chicago.   
   see here: http://www.   
   palaeos.com/Evolution/People1.html   
      
   For more see here: https://tinyurl.com/Fossil-eng   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca