XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans   
   From: randolf@canadianatheists.ca   
      
   On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 20:13:57 -0700   
   Intelligent Party  wrote:   
      
   > If the fetus is a cadaver, and not a person, equivalent to a grown man for   
   > argument's sakes, then it is an immoral sin to not abort.  Illegal even.    
   Thus it   
   > could be against the law to not abort, if you do not want a baby.   
   >   
   > For you are committing an immoral sin, if you do not abort, if the fetus is   
   > certainly a cadaver, and has no human spirit yet.   
   >   
   > If the fetus is truly a cadaver, and has no human spirit, then it is a true   
   error   
   > and immoral sin to not abort.   
      
   Why would a foetus, which is obviously part of a pregnant   
   person's body, be a cadaver?  Or are you referring to an   
   unviable foetus that has to be removed?   
      
   The main part of the problem is the refusal by all of the   
   anti-abortion/pro-slavery/pro-death advocates to accept   
   the fact that a zygote/embryo/foetus is part of the   
   pregnant person's body, which is fundamental to the right   
   of said pregnant person to opt for an abortion at any   
   point during their pregnancy -- "her body, her choice."   
      
   Sin and spirit are arbitrary and sorely-outdated ideas   
   that have no place in modern medicine (note: abortion is   
   a normal and life-saving medical procedure).   
      
   --   
   Randolf Richardson 張文道 - randolf@canadianatheists.ca   
   Canadian atheists - True, Northern, Strong, and Free   
   Beautiful British Columbia, Canada   
   https://www.canadianatheists.ca/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)