XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, talk.philosophy.humanism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   Bob Casanova wrote:   
   > On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 02:06:06 +0000, the following appeared in   
   > sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >   
   >> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:59:04 +0000, the following appeared in   
   >>> sci.skeptic, posted by shogun :   
   >>>   
   >>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared   
   >>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ   
   >>>>> :   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> shogun  writes:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora :   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates   
   >>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom   
   >>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is   
   >>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer   
   >>>>>>>>> relevant.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Relevant to what?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and   
   >>>>>> many other places as well.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly   
   >>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,   
   >>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on   
   >>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no   
   >>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.   
   >>>>   
   >>> There was no need to confirm what I wrote; I already knew I   
   >>> was correct.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> nice. so are you a pious person?   
   >>   
   > Why do you ask? It wouldn't affect the accuracy of my   
   > comment either way.   
      
      
   i have no qualms with its accuracy. i am curious and want to know   
   the kind of views believers and non-believers espouse.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)