XPost: alt.atheism, alt.agnosticism, talk.philosophy.humanism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: xmfuller@t.query.com   
      
   jojo wrote:   
   > Xx/v]andrak|≡xX wrote:   
   >> jojo wrote:   
   >>> anthk wrote:   
   >>>> On 2024-10-02, shogun  wrote:   
   >>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared   
   >>>>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ   
   >>>>>> :   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> shogun  writes:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in   
   >>>>>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora :   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> David Dalton wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates   
   >>>>>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom   
   >>>>>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion   
   >>>>>>>>>>> which is   
   >>>>>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer   
   >>>>>>>>>> relevant.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Relevant to what?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled   
   >>>>>>> world, and   
   >>>>>>> many other places as well.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly   
   >>>>>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle,   
   >>>>>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere".   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on   
   >>>>> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no   
   >>>>> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The closest to a religion I'd believe would be   
   >>>> synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from   
   >>>> any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism.... ehhh   
   >>> dont think so.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> No one's saying there's synchronicity jojo.   
   >   
   > you are saying it, you are saying there is panpsychism.   
   >   
      
   I don't know what that is.   
   --   
   1.11 hrs the number of the beast You try to keep me in cages But baby   
   you got to catch me first You think your love is contagious I do my best   
   you cant do your worst "Nonsense." --Joannis PapaOomMowMow   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)