Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,584 of 142,579    |
|    Kestrel Clayton to RonO    |
|    Re: Is Jonathan Wells any type of ID per    |
|    13 Mar 25 11:21:28    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> > They were not all pretend > scientists like Wells, Nelson, Luskin,       >> Dembski and Meyer. Both Behe and       >>> Minnich got tenure and became Professors at their respective       >>> universities. Both fully understand what science actually is, and       >>> that is why their testimony during the Dover creationist fiasco was       >>> so dishonest.       >>       >> That is the point I was trying to make, although perhaps I did not       >> express it well.       >>       >> > They both decided to prevaricate as much as the thought that > they       >> could get away with. They both fully understood that there was not       >>> any ID science worth teaching in the public schools, but they tried       >>> to lie about it, and deny that they understood why the bait and       >>> switch had been going down 100% of the time for the previous 3       >>> years. They had been in full support of using ID solely as bait for       >>> the previous 3 years. Wells claimed that Minnich was there when the       >>> decision to start running the bait and switch was made. Sternberg       >>> may have had a career in science, but he flushed it down the toilet       >>> in order to dishonestly support the ID scam. The ID perps have been       >>> paying him a salary since 2007 as compensation for what he did for       >>> them, but his science output dropped to zero after joining the ID       >>> scam unit of the Discovery Institute. Sternberg is a sad case. He       >>> could not use his expertise to support the dishonest ID scam, so he       >>> spent about the next decade working on whale fossil gap denial. Behe       >>> destroyed that effort by claiming that whale evolution was just the       >>> type of evolution expected to be due to natural selection. It had       >>> obviously occurred by natural means, but it was a bad type of       >>> evolution that Behe's designer would have done differently. A decade       >>> of bogus effort down the tubes. Sternberg has had to work up some       >>> other angle since then. According to a recent article Sternberg is       >>> exploring "information beyond the genome". What is really sad is       >>> that Sternberg was a taxonomist, and his work had likely fully       >>> supported biological evolution before he quit science in order to       >>> sell ID as bait.       >>>       >>> https://evolutionnews.org/2025/03/richard-sternberg-on-the-       >>> information- beyond-the-genome/       >>       >> I don't think we substantially disagree on any of this. If I came off       >> as arguing with you, my sincere apologies.       >>       >       > I do not view it as arguing, just discussing the topic.              Fair! Just wanted to be certain I wasn't coming off wrong.              (Also, this is abuse. Arguments are 12A, just down the hall.)              --       [The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]       Kestrel Clayton       "Every normal woman must be tempted, at times, to stoke the fire,       host the black mass, and begin eating hearts." — Rose Bailey              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca