[continued from previous message]   
      
   > back it up is a pretty strong clue.   
      
   The measure of literalism is in the *interpretation* of the text of   
   Genesis, not the quoting of it. Your response indicates that you know   
   this, but attempted to slide past it to your real agenda, at the expense   
   of correctness and honesty.   
      
   >   
   > I note you don't deny it.   
   >   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> and something I and many scientists   
   >>>>>> who are Christians believe.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> The timescale God used (days or millions of years) and the way (deism,   
   >>>>>> TE, PC, OEC, ID, YEC, other) are of course widely debated.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)