Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,662 of 142,602    |
|    RonO to Martin Harran    |
|    Re: Evolutionary creationism (4/4)    |
|    16 Mar 25 08:42:49    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>>>>>>>>>>> interference with evolution, but some of them are tweekers like       Behe,       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and still remain under Saint Augustine's admonishment.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>> More conjecture on your part. Unless of course you can provide       >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific examples.       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> They admit to it on their web site.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Where on their web site do they admit it?       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Some of them are still tweekers       >>>>>>>>>>>> like Behe, and would be the same type of science denier as Behe       is.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> Yet again, you can't give a single specific example.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> In order to abide by Saint Augustine's admonishment they wouldn't       need to       >>>>>>>>>>>> limit biological evolution due to their Biblical beliefs. They       claim       >>>>>>>>>>>> that their god made humans in his own image using biological       evolution..       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> You do understand that there is a theological debate about what       "in his       >>>>>>>>>>>> image" means, right? So what literal belief are they supporting       and       >>>>>>>>>>>> should they even be trying to support any of the in       erpretations? Which       >>>>>>>>>>>> Biblical beliefs are they willing to falsify using science?       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> The reason you can't give any specific examples is that you are       >>>>>>>>>>> presenting their case upside down. They are not trying to *force*       any       >>>>>>>>>>> science into anything; to the extent that they are *forcing*       anything,       >>>>>>>>>>> they are forcing their traditional Bible interpretation into       >>>>>>>>>>> accommodating what science tells us.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>> St Augustine would undoubtedly have heartily endorsed what they are       >>>>>>>>>>> doing.       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>> Ron Okimoto       >>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These creationists are claiming that some of the existing       science is       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> consistent with their Biblical interpretation, but it is not       consistent       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with what other creationists believe. If we rewrote the Bible       today       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with our current understanding of cosmology we would still be       wrong       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about some things, and they would have to be rewritten at some       later       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> date. Saint Augustine's admonishment makes it unnecessary to       rewrite or       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinterpret the Bible.       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ron Okimoto       >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>>>       >>>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>       >              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca