From: nospam@buzz.off   
      
   On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:21:45 -0600, the following appeared   
   in talk.origins, posted by Pro Plyd   
   :   
      
   >Bob Casanova wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 17:41:22 +0000, the following appeared   
   >> in talk.origins, posted by Martin Harran   
   >> :   
   >>   
   >>> On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 22:24:23 +1100, MarkE  wrote:   
   >>> [...]   
   >>>> As I said, "This post is not an opportunity to dive down the hundred   
   >>>> rabbit holes that this overview touches on." The micro/macro question is   
   >>>> _the_ evolution debate.   
   >>>   
   >>> Simply clarifying whether you accept that humans are members of the   
   >>> ape family, all evolved from a common ancestor, or whether you think   
   >>> humans were created separately as a standalone species doesn't involve   
   >>> any rabbit holes.   
   >>>   
   >> Of course it doesn't. If this discussion were a football   
   >> game (US type), he'd be a star receiver; he can weave and   
   >> dodge with the best of them.   
   >>   
   >> (Still waiting for that info regarding the "Increased   
   >> traction" for ID...)   
   >   
   >   
   >Here it is:   
   >   
   Yeah, that was my take, too:   
      
   1) Assert.   
   2) When asked for evidence, ignore or waffle.   
   3) Reassert.   
      
   Lather, rinse, repeat.   
   >   
   --   
      
   Bob C.   
      
   "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,   
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not   
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"   
      
   - Isaac Asimov   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)