Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,710 of 142,602    |
|    JTEM to E.Laureti    |
|    Re: With us to Mars    |
|    18 Mar 25 16:26:12    |
      From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 3/18/25 8:28 AM, E.Laureti wrote:              >> So you're not wrong. But the proverbial "Quantum Leap" could be       >> achieved with a larger, faster, more capable rover.       >>       >> We can build a vehicle that can cover 10 or 100 times the       >> distance in a fraction of the time. And THAT is likely a far       >> simpler and cheaper and safer than sending humans, AND it would       >> be another step (more lessons) towards a really successful       >> manned mission.              > really i don't uderstand of what propulsion you speak.       > It you want ... write here              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9M730_Burevestnik              There have been test flights already.              It's a cruise missile with unlimited range. Launch in Antarctica,       take out London or Beijing.              If we eliminate the countless billions being laundered in the       Ukraine, not to mention all the insane give-aways already uncovered       by DOGE, we can afford even a manned mission! I'm just saying that       we could achieve a quantum leap in space exploration even without       sending people -- and we can do it for a lot cheaper. PLUS, it       doesn't exclude an eventual manned mission, it's laying the       groundwork for a bigger & better manned mission!                            --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca