[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> Bhehe does. No example.   
   >   
   >Why would this have ever been needed when we have the claims of Biologos   
   >to evaluate with no author listed?  Just another dishonest dodge to keep   
   >lying.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I asked you what science is contradicted by the miracle of Christs'   
   >> Resurrection. No example.   
   >   
   >This isn't even relevant to what we are discussing.  Just another   
   >dishonest dodge to continue lying.  Why would miracles have to   
   >contradict science when supernatural miracles, by their very definition   
   >fall out side of nature and so outside of the ability of science to make   
   >any determination about them?   
   >   
   >>   
   >> I asked you for a single example of any miracle claimed by Christians   
   >> that contradicts evolution. No example.   
   >   
   >Again, just a dishonest dodge to keep lying.  Why would this be relevant   
   >to what you were lying about?  I don't even know why you would even   
   >think this was relevant.  It is even a stupid request.  All you need to   
   >understand is that the 7 days of creation were a series of miracles.   
   >There are obviously Christians that believe that evolution did not   
   >happen.  The Bible claims that land plants ere created before sea   
   >creatures, but we know that sea creatures evolved over a hundred million   
   >years before land plants evolved on this planet from fresh water algae,   
   >and that the angiosperms mentioned in the Bible did not evolve until   
   >after dinos became the dominant vertebrate tetrapod on land.   
   >   
   >>   
   >> There's no point in trying to continue a debate with you when you just   
   >> ignore contradictory evidence to your claims and call the person   
   >> presenting it a stupid liar. Do you think anyone takes your stupid   
   >> insults seriously.?   
   >   
   >There is no reason to keep lying.  There is no contradictory evidence.   
   >You were given the quotes that you needed and you decided to start lying   
   >about reality instead of deal with reality.  You were a stupid liar.   
   >Your continued dodges would indicate that you have put considerable   
   >thought into lying about the issue, but what you came up with was   
   >irrelevant or did not support your lying.  You might call that being stupid.   
   >   
   >Ron Okimoto   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> Making claims about me does nothing   
   >>> to change the fact that you understand that you have been lying.  What   
   >>> is the definition of supernatural miracles?  Natural mechanisms would   
   >>> not be responsible for what those supernatural miracles produced.  What   
   >>> Trump does has nothing to do with you lying about reality.  If you have   
   >>> some weird definition of supernatural miracles you should have addressed   
   >>> it instead of running from the quotes and doing what you did.  You have   
   >>> been stupid and dishonest.  I can't change that.   
   >>>   
   >>> Ron Okimoto   
   >>   
      
      
   The bullshit continue to fly. Sad really to see an intelligent guy   
   making such a fool of himself :(   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)