Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,859 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to All    |
|    How is the Intelligent Design Movement D    |
|    29 Mar 25 17:21:21    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              https://seanmcdowell.org/blog/how-is-the-intelligent-design-move       ent-doing-interview-with-william-dembski              I found this Dembski interview while looking for any evidence that the       ID bait and switch scam had any type of future. The interview was from       2016 a couple of years before Dembski had retired from the ID scam as an       abject failure. None of Dembski's junk made it into the Top Six, so       that tells you how highly Dembski's "ID science" was regarded by the       other ID perps in 2017.              As crazy as it may seem along with the usual lies about ID still being       viable for anything but bait, Dembski is admitting that the ID perps       wanted more religious support from more Christian denominations. This       indicates what a lie the ID scam science claims have always been. Real       science does not need support from organized religion.              QUOTE:       (2) In my remarks about the role of the church in advancing ID, I was       trying to be a bit provocative to get people thinking. To be sure,       well-wishers of ID abound in Christian circles. But how many are willing       to put their necks on the chopping block and make a real difference in       the scientific and cultural debate? As 19th century activist Annie       Besant put it:              Plenty of people wish well to any good cause, but very few care to exert       themselves to help it, and still fewer will risk anything in its       support. “Some one ought to do it, but why should I?” is the ever       re-echoed phrase of weak-kneed amiability. “Some one ought to do it, so       why not I?” is the cry of some earnest servant of man, eagerly forward       springing to face some perilous duty.              So, how much good has the Christian community really done in advancing       ID? Sure, there have been pockets of genuine support in the Christian       community. But why is the first and only ID think-tank/research center       at a Christian college or university Baylor's Michael Polanyi Center       (which I founded in 1999, and which was dismantled the following year       --- thanks in this case not to young-earth creationists but to theistic       evolutionists)? And why is the $100M spent on a Noah's Ark theme park       several times more than has been spent on all ID efforts over the last       20 years? Let's get some sense of proportion.       END QUOTE:              The ID perps have disenfranchised most of the YEC denominations because       they have run the bait and switch on the creationist rubes too many       times, and nearly all of them have dropped the issue instead of bending       over for the switch scam. The creationists rubes do not want to teach       the obfuscation and denial if they can't tell the students the religious       reason for lying to them. West Virginia in 2024 indicates that there       are still YEC creationist rubes that will take the bait, but it is       obviously for dishonest religious reasons.              You should read this interview in context. Dembski got first hand       experience with what type of theocracy the ID perps were trying to       recreate by being forced to recant and apologize to his students at the       religious college he was teaching at, in order to keep his job. He had       just told them the truth, that the earth and universe were likely much       older than depicted in the Bible and that the Noachian flood was likely       local instead of global. If he had not recanted and apologized he would       have been fired. As it was his contract was not renewed and Dembski       ended up working full time for the ID scam unit of the Discovery       Institute putting out ID as bait. Dembski failed to produce any       convincing ID science scam material that could be used as useful bait,       and Dembski "retired" from the ID scam and the Discovery Institute in       2014 (I think it was 2014). He claimed that he was moving on from the       ID scam, and wanted to go into education. He was a failure at trying to       turn a new leaf and got hired back at the ID scam unit a couple of years       after this interview (after the ID perps had killed ID on TO by putting       out the Top Six best evidences for ID at the end of 2017).              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca