Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140,887 of 142,579    |
|    Martin Harran to All    |
|    Re: Evolutionary creationism (3/3)    |
|    01 Apr 25 13:03:59    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> primarily the things covered in the Gospel relating to Jesus,       >> particularly the Virgin Birth and the Resurrection - both these are       >> specified in the Nicene Creed and denial of them is a denial of basic       >> tenets of Christianity. [1]       >>       >> The second 'optional' category is miracles that have happened to       >> individuals outside the Gospels, things like miracles at Lourdes or       >> used as part of the canonisation process [2]. In declaring these       >> miracles, the Catholic Church does not definitively declare them to be       >> supernatural; what they declare is that they are things that have been       >> fully investigated by appropriate experts (typically medical as well       >> as religious and often involving non-Catholics and all possible       >> natural causes have been ruled out [3] so Catholics are free as       >> individuals to treat these as supernatural but that belief is not       >> obligatory.       >>       >> To sum up, God by definition is beyond natural forces or human       >> language, so we are always going to be limited in trying to understand       >> let alone explain him. That is where Faith ultimately comes into it       >> and that, to me, is very much a personal experience. As someone once       >> said, falling in love with God is like falling in love with another       >> person, you can't really explain it but it just becomes part of your       >> life.       >>       >       >okay, I am also a determinist with an allowance for continuous random       >(quantum level) variations.              Sorry, that come s across as something of an oxymoron to me - like a       woman being 'a little bit pregnant' :) I would think that things are       either deterministic or not, no halfway house available.              >So an instantaneous determination but       >increasing probabilistic predictions as time to prediction increases.       >Free will is right out. Consider what I must think of what you are       >saying above.              Fair enough as long as we both recognise that we are talking world       views, not something we can back up with real evidence.              […]              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca