[continued from previous message]   
      
   >>>>>My argument is that for the overwhelming majority,   
   >>>>>competition within sex is the better course if fairness is a   
   >>>>>concern. The (suspected) extreme minority you note can be   
   >>>>>handled on a case-by-case basis.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Incorrect.  Your expressed solution, based on XY sex assignment,   
   >>>>   
   >>>Nope. read it again.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> To refresh your convenient amnesia, the following are your   
   >>comments from the quoted text above:   
   >>***********************************************   
   >>The issue is regarding the difference between biological   
   >>males (generally XY) and biological females (generally XX)   
   >>************************************************   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>ignores the individuals I described above.  In fact, your expressed   
   >>>>solution, ignores the actual problem, of the majority denying the   
   >>>>human rights of a minority out of prejudice. Not sure how you think   
   >>>>that's "fair".     
   >>>>   
   >>>It's not prejudice, and I was referring to those individuals   
   >>>who express differently despite their genetics.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>  To refresh your convenient amnesia, the following are   
   >>your comments from the quoted text above:   
   >>********************************************   
   >>if it weren't a   
   >>problem such athletes as "Lia" Thomas wouldn't go from   
   >>underperforming in men's sports to record breakers in female   
   >>sports,   
   >>*********************************************   
   >>   
   >>Trump's ban specifically limits Title IX competition to "biological   
   >>females" aka those with the "correct" XX genes.  That is YOUR   
   >>expressed solution.  YOUR solution unnecessarily and irrationally   
   >>eliminates from competition those individuals as I described.     
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> But since   
   >>>I'm sure you don't understand, even though I clearly stated   
   >>>it, that any further discussion would be futile.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>Clearly you know yourself well enough.  I have no doubt you will   
   >>continue to lie about what you and I posted, as usual.   
   >>   
   >Nope. Your continuing willful refusal to comprehend what I   
   >wrote, cherry-picking particular phrases while ignoring the   
   >context and full content, shows you are only interested in   
   >trolling and "gotcha" points.    
      
      
   Once again you accuse me of doing what you do.  Perhaps someday you   
   will learn to stop exercising your inner troll before you let it out   
   of its pigpen.   
      
      
   >So I won't be responding to   
   >you on this or any other subject. Have A Nice Life.   
      
      
   Oh please, PLEASE don't throw me into that briar patch!     
      
      
      
      
   --    
   To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)