Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,047 of 142,602    |
|    RonO to RonO    |
|    Re: New infections with the dairy virus     |
|    05 Jul 25 07:50:24    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              On 6/30/2025 7:19 PM, RonO wrote:       > On 6/30/2025 5:09 PM, RonO wrote:       >> On 6/30/2025 4:42 PM, RonO wrote:       >>> https://hogvet51.substack.com/p/h5n1-dairy-infection-narratives-and       >>>       >>> I found this site on dairy influenza, and this article notes most of       >>> what I have been reporting on. The lack of testing and epidemiology       >>> studies. They still do not know how the cows are getting infected.       >>> The claim that contaminated milking equipment might be the source of       >>> infection or animal contact can't be replicated. Cows living with       >>> infected cows do not get infected, and repeated contact with       >>> contaminated milking equipment failed to transmit the virus.       >>>       >>> The missing component in the tests were infected dairy workers       >>> working with the cattle.       >>>       >>> There is also the note that they do not know how the poultry farms       >>> are getting infected even though they go down around infected       >>> dairies. Again they fail to note that infected dairy workers likely       >>> also work at the poultry farms.       >>>       >>> It seems crazy that they haven't figured out how dairy workers are       >>> transmitting the virus to the cows and poultry.       >>>       >>> This article also notes that the USDA is not reporting new infections       >>> if they occur in states that have cleared the virus already.       >>> Apparently Colorado has started to report more infected herds, but       >>> they aren't counted because the herds were previously infected last       >>> year. They aren't even noting if it is the D1.1 virus or the B3.13       >>> dairy infection. Nevada and Arizona were infected with the D1.1       >>> genotype, and it turned out to be the same lineage that infected the       >>> Washington state poultry workers, and the Wyoming human patient and       >>> the Nevada dairies and dairy worker. These were the poultry workers       >>> that got caught leaving Washington (several of them were detected as       >>> positive in Oregon and sent back to Washington). What likely       >>> happened is that some of the infected poultry workers or their       >>> contacts were not detected and managed to get to Nevada and       >>> eventually Wyoming and Arizona. The epidemiology was never       >>> attempted. They never tested the dairy workers and never did contact       >>> tracing between the dairies in Nevada and Arizona. They knew that       >>> they didn't get cattle, but they refused to determine if dairy       >>> workers had moved from state to state.       >>>       >>> QUOTE:       >>> We continue to have good evidence that both the B3.13 and D1.1       >>> strains persist in infected herds and spread onward to new herds and       >>> to poultry flocks via unknown mechanisms despite assumed best efforts       >>> to contain spread with quarantines and increased biosecurity.       >>> END QUOTE:       >>>       >>> From this guys article the missing link to infecting more dairy       >>> cattle are the dairy workers. The studies that failed to transmit       >>> the virus did not have infected dairy workers working with the       >>> cattle. One early article noted that dairy workers were likely       >>> getting eye infections because they wiped their faces with the same       >>> towel that they washed the cows utters with before applying the       >>> suction cups. Spreading the virus could work both ways with that       >>> towel. They refuse to make restricting dairy worker movements a       >>> requirement for quarantine. It is still only recommended that dairy       >>> workers do not work on other farms if they work at an infected       >>> dairy. No one should wonder how it spreads to other herds after all       >>> the infected herds have been identified and quarantined.       >>>       >>> It has been known since the first flocks got infected in Michigan       >>> that dairy workers from infected dairies also worked on the       >>> commercial farms that got infected. How the poultry flocks are being       >>> infected should be no mystery.       >>>       >>> This guy also notes that poultry flocks are going down with the dairy       >>> virus in the Midwest and those states are not reporting infected       >>> dairy herds as is likely the case. Everyone understands that the       >>> poultry flocks are getting infected by the nearby dairy herds, but no       >>> one wants to admit that dairy workers are taking the virus to the       >>> poultry farms.       >>>       >>> Ron Okimoto       >>>       >>>       >>       >> I should note that the Missouri study that found that most dairy       >> cattle tested had antibodies to human influenza A (the samples were       >> collected before the dairy epidemic hit Missouri). They could not       >> have gotten infected by wild birds because wild birds are not infected       >> by human adapted influenza A. The obvious vector of transmission to       >> dairy cattle are infected dairy workers infecting the cattle.       >>       >> The study found that most dairy cattle were being infected by human       >> influenza A or swine influenza A (can also infect humans). So       >> influenza infection of dairy cattle is not unusual, and since it was       >> human adapted influenza A it was likely due to the spread of the virus              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca