home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 141,126 of 142,579   
   RonO to JTEM   
   Re: The next generation of IDiots   
   24 Jul 25 07:02:09   
   
   From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 7/23/2025 11:50 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 7/23/25 9:15 PM, RonO wrote:   
   >   
   >> See a nut job, no claims of having to observe anything.   
   >   
   > Lol!  "I'm not a nut job. I have faith without evidence! I   
   > don't need to see anything, not with my faith!"   
   >   
   > YOU are faith based. You are. Fix you. Once you deconstruct   
   > YOUR problem, once you correct YOUR faith based beliefs,   
   > then you can complain about anyone else's.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   See.  Just a snip and run nut job.   
      
   REPOST:   
   On 7/23/2025 6:58 PM, JTEM wrote:   
    > On 7/23/25 5:35 PM, RonO wrote:   
    >   
    >> What a nut job.   
    >   
    > Oh, okay, just cite when & where abiogenesis has been observed:   
    >   
    >       {crickets chirping}   
    >   
    > So you think only a "nut job" would point out the fact that   
    > abiogenesis is faith based, not science based, yet you have   
    > zero science and only faith behind your beliefs...   
    >   
    > Wow. That's crazy!  You're a nut job!   
    >   
    >> I have always contended that the origin of life work is among the   
   weakest of scientific endeavors.   
      
   See a nut job, no claims of having to observe anything.   
      
   REPOST:   
   What a nut job.  I have always contended that the origin of life work is   
   among the weakest of scientific endeavors.  They don't even expect to   
   figure out how life actually began on this planet.  The ones that know   
   what they are doing understand that they can only expect to figure out   
   the most likely path to how life arose on this planet.  The most likely   
   path does not need to be the actual path taken.   
      
   You should grow a brain and try to think before you write anything.   
   END REPOST:   
      
   You should grow a brain and try to think before you write anything.  You   
   do not have to observe abiogenesis in order to scientifically explore   
   how it might have happened.  Your nut job observations should tell you that.   
   END REPOST:   
      
   You really do not have to observe abiogenesis in order to scientifically   
   explore how it might have happened.  There is no doubt that abiogenesis   
   occurred somewhere at sometime in the past.  Life did not always exist   
   on this planet because this planet did not always exist.  You only have   
   to have faith in reality to figure that out.  Just think of how we have   
   figured out how the universe works since the Big Bang.  Not the same   
   kind of faith that you are claiming is it.  Your stupidity, just apes   
   the bogus anti-science claims of the anti-science creationists.  If you   
   can still breath without assistance you should understand that much.   
      
   Ron Okimoto   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca