Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,168 of 142,579    |
|    JTEM to RonO    |
|    Re: ID scam lying about Darwinism    |
|    29 Jul 25 15:22:13    |
      From: jtem01@gmail.com               RonO wrote:        > QUOTE:       > Does intelligent design have a better answer for the origin of the       > universe and the origin of life than the standard neo-Darwinian       > explanation?              Darwin is a myth. There is ZERO separation between Darwin and some       random invisible sky pixie. You're believing in something that does       not and never has existed.              Darwin did even believe in evolution! His one theory, Pangenesis,       was 100% consistent with (and plagiarized from the same sources as)       the lysenkoism of the communist world.              Let me rephrase that so any lurkers can understand how disordered       you are, that you're a compulsive liar and you are intentionally       misinforming people...              The communist world under Stalin rejected and outlawed evolution.       They saw it as imperialistic, as an excuse for Nazi style "Master       Race" teachings. Put short, the communist world outlawed evolution       because they saw it as imperialistic philosophy. But...              Darwin and his one and only theory, Pangenesis, was fine. You could       get away with that. In fact, they plagiarized the same sources as       Darwin, called their version "lysenkoism" and are credited with       sparking a famine in China with their denials...              We're all used to morons misunderstanding and misusing a term. Most       of us have done it ourselves. And then SUDDENLY the devout believers,       such as you, pretend it never happens, when the flatulent, racist,       classicist plagiarist eventually starts using the word "Evolution"       but comes up with a theory that those who outlawed evolution       couldn't have a problem with...              SECONDLY...              I have personally argued with I.D. proponents who denied that they       were concluding "God." That, they fully acknowledged that even if       we all agreed with I.D. we could all decide it was aliens who       stopped by the earth and "Designed" life...              > The ID perps want to make Darwin into some type of boogeyman.              Wrong. YOU keep proving that you are devoutly religious, that you       operate on faith and that you worship Darwin despite all fact...              You make a leap of faith!              You're so weak that you can't admit anything, even the obvious       fraud that is Darwin, or your mind comes crashing down.                            --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca