home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   talk.origins      Evolution versus creationism (sometimes      142,579 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 141,186 of 142,579   
   Bob Casanova to All   
   Re: The next generation of IDiots   
   01 Aug 25 18:57:51   
   
   From: nospam@buzz.off   
      
   On Sun, 27 Jul 2025 10:55:25 -0700, the following appeared   
   in talk.origins, posted by Bob Casanova :   
      
   >On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 08:18:18 -0700, the following appeared   
   >in talk.origins, posted by Bob Casanova :   
   >   
   >>On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:55:36 +0200, the following appeared   
   >>in talk.origins, posted by IDentity :   
   >>   
   >>>On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:33:09 -0400, JTEM  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>  RonO wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> That ID is still successful as bait should should be   
   >>>>   
   >>>>How many people do you *Still* fool into believing that   
   >>>>abiogenesis is real science, instead of a religious   
   >>>>belief?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>There's no facts backing up abiogenesis, you simply like   
   >>>>it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>That's it.   
   >>>   
   >>>It's actually quite simple to prove that abiogenesis, as well as   
   >>>evolution without intelligent control, is impossible, using   
   >>>fundamental physical concepts and axioms.   
   >>>   
   >>>But not the current concepts and axioms which mainstream science is   
   >>>built upon.  Most of these concepts and axioms, such as   
   >>>thermodynamics, are fundamentally flawed and inconsistent with actual   
   >>>reality.  Trying to prove a theory is wrong using the very same flawed   
   >>>arguments which the theory is based on obviously doesn't lead   
   >>>anywhere.   
   >>>   
   >>>So, the current scientific concepts and axioms need to be corrected   
   >>>first, before there is any hope for real progress in science.  Many   
   >>>are working on this now however,  so I guess it's only a matter of   
   >>>time.   
   >>>   
   >>Perhaps you'd be so good as to state clearly at least two of   
   >>the "concepts and axioms" which are "fundamentally flawed",   
   >>along with the specific flaws you imagine exist and why you   
   >>consider them to be flaws? Precisely and in detail, please.   
   >>   
   >>Thanks.   
   >>   
   >Still waiting...   
   >>   
      
      
   So, just more of your usual bullshit? OK; thanks for   
   confirming.   
   >   
   --   
      
   Bob C.   
      
   "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,   
    the one that heralds new discoveries, is not   
    'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"   
      
   - Isaac Asimov   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca