Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,218 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to All    |
|    Why Scientists Lie    |
|    15 Aug 25 13:23:21    |
      From: rokimoto557@gmail.com              https://evolutionnews.org/2025/08/why-scientists-lie/              This seems to be an obvious projection piece from the ID perps. They       claim that scientists lie for recognition. This is true in a lot of       cases, but it takes a really stupid and incompetent scientists to think       that they can get away with it. The type that they have at the       Discovery Institute that make their living by lying about the science.              It doesn't take a genius to understand that you can't lie about       something in science and expect to get away with it unless the lie is so       inconsequential that no one checks it out. The type that tell these       inconsequential lies are like the ID perps and probably only in it to       make a living by supporting a stupid bait and switch scam like ID has       been for over 2 decades.              The "scientists" that cheat and lie like the ID perps are usually in it       for the money. Guys like Sternberg, Dembski, Meyer, and Luskin likely       can't get an honest job any longer with their ID "science" record. The       guys that resort to paper mills and scamming the system to publish       rubbish know that they aren't advancing their science careers. They are       only in it to keep their jobs and maybe get a raise.              Nelson likely never had a real job after graduate school. He is also       the ID perp that admitted that the ID science had never existed before       Dover after he and his fellow ID perps had started running the bait and       switch on their hapless creationist support base. Nelson likely       understood from the beginning that he was only in the ID scam to use ID       as bait in order to support the ID perp's Wedge goals. Nelson likely       never wanted the ID perps to accomplish any valid science of any kind       relative to the creation. It all would have just been more science to       deny for a YEC like Nelson. Nelson was happy to lie about the science       in order to support his religious beliefs. He never expected to       accomplish any valid science.              The ID perps are likely using this article to make them feel better       about how dishonest the ID scam has always been. From the very       beginning of the name change of creationism to intelligent design in Of       Pandas and People the scam artists have known what the ID scam has       always been. Thaxton was editor of that ID scam text. Kenyon was one       of the main authors. Meyer wrote the teachers notes for the book, and       Behe admitted to writing some of the book, but was not credited. All of       them were among the original fellow of the ID scam unit at the Discovery       Institute. Most of the book was written before the Supreme court ruled       that no creation science existed that was worth calling science, so they       all knew that what was in that book was never going to pass as science       even with the name change. The name change was only made to keep the       science denial alive.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca