XPost: it.discussioni.misteri   
   From: pnn@pnn.org   
      
   On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:48:13 -0400, WolfFan    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Aug 18, 2025, James Nicoll wrote   
   >(in article <107ve2g$1qs$1@reader1.panix.com>):   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Has Norman Lorimer Dean come back from the dead?   
   >   
   >I already mentioned the Dean Drive. This boy’s stuff is much better than   
   >the Dean Drive, it’s a perpetual motion machine of the second type.   
   >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion   
   >   
   >Alas, he cannot demonstrate anything. He can’t lift one kilo to an altitude   
   >of one meter and sustain it for one minute. Hey, he can’t lift a gram to a   
   >centimeter for 1 second. He has, according to his own stuff, been working at   
   >this since 1998, possibly earlier, with no results. Apparenntly he uses   
   >magnets in some fashion; I am reminded of the Magnetic Space Coupe in 1960s   
   >Dick Tracy comic strips.   
   >   
   >https://dicktracy.fandom.com/wiki/Space_Coupe   
   >   
   >Gotta love it.   
      
      
   You're crazy. Your understanding of physics and electrodynamics is so   
   poor that you've gone so far as to compare our electromagnetic space   
   drive to a perpetual motion machine.   
   We've been working on this electromagnetic space drive since 1998,   
   yes, and although our goal is liftoff, we've already achieved results,   
   namely 184 grams of thrust, which far surpasses the ion propulsion   
   used in long-range space missions.   
   Our electromagnetic space drive uses electricity, at 432 MHz, and   
   dipoles to generate thrust. Therefore, it's not a perpetual motion   
   machine because it requires energy input to function.   
   For your information, perpetual motion machines don't exist, while our   
   electromagnetic space drive is a concrete reality, patented, and   
   continuously improved.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)