From: pnn@pnn.org   
      
   On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:21:48 -0700, Rufus Ruffian  wrote:   
      
   >E.Laureti  wrote:   
   >> Rufus Ruffian  posted:   
   >>   
   >> > Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He   
   >> > was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about erraticly,   
   >> > wondering why his machine doesn't work.   
   >> >   
   >> > The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.   
   >> > Always will be.   
   >>   
   >> In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that properly   
   >>  filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent Office)   
   >>  who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -   
   >>  ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT   
   >> THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS   
   >> https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022264177 they   
   >> never examine, they prefer, like all envious, worthless trolls,   
   >>  anonymous defamation.   
   >   
   >   
   >You can patent anything, no matter how Rube Goldberg. No demonstration   
   >of functionality required. Patents don't mean anything.   
   >   
   >You can't defend the technical deficiencies of your claims. That means   
   >your Purely Nonsense Narrative is bunkum.   
   >   
   >   
   >(snip enraged kookrant that's unbecoming of any scientist)   
      
   Your idiosyncrasy is proverbial. You look like you're down and your   
   nickname sucks.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)