From: user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid   
      
   Rufus Ruffian  posted:   
      
   > E.Laureti  wrote:   
   > > Rufus Ruffian  posted:   
   > >   
   > > > Technical flaws were pointed out in Laureti's theory and practice. He   
   > > > was unable to respond coherently. Meanwhile he thrashes about erraticly,   
   > > > wondering why his machine doesn't work.   
   > > >   
   > > > The "invention" has always been ridiculed on Usenet, and ignored in RL.   
   > > > Always will be.   
   > >   
   > > In the meantime, they must also laugh at the Italian society that properly   
   > >  filed my patent F432BA and at those from the EPO (European Patent Office)   
   > >  who granted it to me. But this WO2022264177 -   
   > >  ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SPACECRAFT MOVEMENT WITHOUT   
   > > THE EMISSION OF REACTION MASS   
   > > https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2022264177 they   
   > > never examine, they prefer, like all envious, worthless trolls,   
   > >  anonymous defamation.   
   >   
   >   
   > You can patent anything, no matter how Rube Goldberg. No demonstration   
   > of functionality required. Patents don't mean anything.   
   >   
   > You can't defend the technical deficiencies of your claims. That means   
   > your Purely Nonsense Narrative is bunkum.   
      
   The PNN is based on the physical law of the Lorentz force for open circuits.   
   What you are talking   
    about is based on mental hallucinations passed off as physics.   
      
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > (snip enraged kookrant that's unbecoming of any scientist)   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)