[continued from previous message]   
      
   >> >> >> >I can say that an investor should do a basic PNN test on their own,   
   >> >> >> >with their experts,   
   >> >> >> >to understand what they might be buying and to ensure they won't be   
   deceived.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> That's ironic, since most people consider PNN to be a scam.   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >successful defamation.. and never see the PNN experiments that disprove   
   >> >> > the defamation   
   >> >>   
   >> >> What kinds of patents do you have in the field of PNN?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >> >Afterward, if they want to buy the F432BA, we can conduct an   
   >> >> >> >experimental demonstration of the prototype's functioning.   
   >> >> >> >Then, in theory, they could even build PNN spaceships themselves   
   >> >> >> > by carefully studying how the F432BA works.   
   >> >> >>   
   >> >> >> What happens if, afterward, they don't want to buy your product?   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >I certainly won't tell to you now   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > ....and given your prejudices,   
   >> >> > you  doesn't even consider conducting   
   >> >> > an experiment by herself that contradicts your beliefs  :-)   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >Put your money in comic rocketry and be happy :-)   
   >> >>   
   >> >> LOL!  I'm not prejudiced against you.  I think it would be cool if   
   >> >> your super-spaceships were a reality.   
   >> >   
   >> >You  say what I do not say.   
   >> >And I have always said that I have demonstrative prototypes of the PNN   
   >> >and not spaceships. Unfortunately, it seems that in order   
   >> >to defame the PNN you alter what I say.   
   >>   
   >> How far away from spaceships would you say you are now? And have you   
   >> even applied for any patents for the PNN?   
   >   
   >I have a patent (about 2020) of PNN . I have no time no money to patent   
   continuosly   
      
   What features of PNN was the patent for?   
      
   >> >> And I think that's true for almost everyone else.  Never underestimate   
   >> >> the power of human greed, so that people would be beating a path to   
   >> >> your door if they thought they could make money with PNN.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> It's just that no one is impressed enough by what you're doing to get   
   >> >> involved with it.   
   >> >>   
   >> >   
   >> >   
   >> >They are unaffected despite the demonstrative evidence we can provide   
   >> > and do not want to see?   
   >>   
   >> Your demonstrations are a bit underwhelming, wouldn't you say?   
   >   
   >Many persons haven't patience to examine all   
      
   Have you published any articles in any scientific or engineering   
   journals about this?   
      
   >> >Or the evidence that you do not want to see in small to convince   
   >> > yourselves that the PNN is not a scam?   
   >> >   
   >> > I say that I am happy that all missile astronautics,   
   >> > which you inadvertently defend, goes down like the Titanic.   
   >> >   
   >> >Just change the music of your orchestra while your Titanic sinks ?   
   >>   
   >> Why wouldn't the aeronautics industry be interested in what you're   
   >> doing?   
   >   
   >   
   >20 years ago ... at the beginning of today PNN in italian industry   
   >Alenia Spazio they said to me : if PNN works it is a problem for us  :-)   
      
   But you always present PNN as a solution for that problem, right?   So   
   why wouldn't the industry be interested in that "solution"?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)