Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,330 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to sticks    |
|    Re: Student of Stanley Miller comments o    |
|    26 Aug 25 15:13:36    |
      [continued from previous message]              Scam junk like irreducible complexity is likely not what you think that       it is. Behe had already admitted that IC systems could evolve by       natural means by the turn of the century. The argument is only meant to       fool the creationist rubes into supporting the ID perp's Wedge strategy.        Most of the creationist support for the ID scam still comes from the       YEC, and young earth creationists would never accept any verification of       any of Behe's IC systems. Behe claims that his type of IC systems       cannot evolve by natural means, and that they are not the type that can       evolve by natural means, but he hasn't figured out how to tell the two       types apart. He has resorted to claiming that 3 neutral mutations found       in any protein that created a new function would be his type of IC, so       interacting protein parts are no longer needed. The kicker is that Behe       has acknowledged that researchers have found 2 neutral mutations needed       to create a new function, and he acknowledges their success, but claims       that it is on the edge of evolution. 2 neutral mutations are still       expected to be routine in a population of around 100 million       individuals, and the examples have been found in populations numbering       in the trillions. YEC would never accept finding these 3 neutral       mutations in the bacterial flagellum. In order to verify that 3 neutral       mutations were needed you need to reconstruct the ancestral protein       sequence and determine that 3 neutral mutations occurred to create the       new function. As noted this has been done to identify 2 neutral       mutations, but verifying the 3 would mean that Behe had verified the       evolution of the flagellum over a billion years ago and it evolved from       preexisting parts that had to change in order to evolve the new       function. This would be rejected by all YEC, and even a lot of old       earth creationists who still want the order of creation of life to be       Biblical, when the Biblical order of creation of life on earth has been       known to be wrong for over a century.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca