From: me22over7@gmail.com   
      
   On 29/08/2025 5:12 pm, Martin Harran wrote:   
   > On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:59:57 +1000, MarkE  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 29/08/2025 12:58 am, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 22:12:16 +1000, MarkE  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 28/08/2025 9:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:50:59 +1000, MarkE  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "science doesn't know X therefore God" - accurate summation or   
   >>>>>> disingenuous caricature? Let the reader decide.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> So help us decide …. how is it a caricature and not an accurate   
   >>>>> summation?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Done, as per my two previous responses.   
   >>>   
   >>> They both just repeat yet again stuff about gaps without considering   
   >>> the possibility of any alternative to God for filling the gaps so they   
   >>> both reinforce that "science doesn't know X therefore God" is indeed   
   >>> an accurate summation.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Let's celebrate the freedom to hold different views.   
   >   
   > .... and not worry about being unable to offer anythting to support   
   > those views.   
      
   To be clear, I am not unwilling to "considering the possibility of any   
   alternative to God for filling the gaps". What possibilities do you have   
   in mind?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)