From: rokimoto557@gmail.com   
      
   On 8/29/2025 8:10 PM, MarkE wrote:   
   > On 29/08/2025 5:12 pm, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >> On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:59:57 +1000, MarkE  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 29/08/2025 12:58 am, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 22:12:16 +1000, MarkE  wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 28/08/2025 9:55 pm, Martin Harran wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:50:59 +1000, MarkE    
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "science doesn't know X therefore God" - accurate summation or   
   >>>>>>> disingenuous caricature? Let the reader decide.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> So help us decide …. how is it a caricature and not an accurate   
   >>>>>> summation?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Done, as per my two previous responses.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> They both just repeat yet again stuff about gaps without considering   
   >>>> the possibility of any alternative to God for filling the gaps so they   
   >>>> both reinforce that "science doesn't know X therefore God" is indeed   
   >>>> an accurate summation.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Let's celebrate the freedom to hold different views.   
   >>   
   >> .... and not worry about being unable to offer anythting to support   
   >> those views.   
   >   
   > To be clear, I am not unwilling to "considering the possibility of any   
   > alternative to God for filling the gaps". What possibilities do you have   
   > in mind?   
   >   
      
   Then you know that you have already failed because it is plainly obvious   
   that the Biblical "God" described in the Bible is not the one that can   
   fill this gap.  If some god is found to fill this gap it is not the one   
   described in the Bible.   
      
   Ron Okimoto   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)