Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,602 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,375 of 142,602    |
|    MarkE to jillery    |
|    Re: Student of Stanley Miller comments o    |
|    31 Aug 25 20:41:08    |
      [continued from previous message]              >> ousted and the new board president wanted nothing of it. Though, I       >> personally think the original intent seemed reasonable and that Judge       >> Jones certainly stepped outside the normal lines of judicial behavior, I       >> personally don't really care if ID is taught in the schools, though it       >> would seem obvious the theory of evolution and it's shortcomings should       >> be part of the course. In the end, you find people, like some of those       >> here, who just like to muck up any topic with this constant reference to       >> this one case and claim a total victory of some kind. I think it should       >> be pretty much tuned out or you get nowhere.       >       >       > Before you two can reasonably claim that supernatural causes are valid       > alternatives to naturalistic ones, you need to identify:       >       > 1. what you mean by supernatural, with examples, and       > 2. how presuming supernatural causes explain anything.       >       > I stipulate for arguments' sake the possibility of a supernatural       > Creator. Now then, tell me how that helps you say whether X is more       > or less likely than Y. With naturalistic causes, there are physical       > limits which are identifiable and can be experimentally demonstrated.       > Not so with supernatural causes.       >              This is a fundamental issue in this debate. Intending to be constructive       and open-minded, what if I frame it this way:              Separate from and prior to specific discussions about science, how do       you regard naturalistic vs supernatural* explanations of origins?              Do you regard one more likely or worthy of consideration that the other,       and why?              * The so-called "God hypothesis", which might be summaried as: A       transcendent/supernatural agent (an unspecified God, intelligent       designer, non-material cause), involved in the origin and/or       organisation of the material universe.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca