Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,383 of 142,579    |
|    Mark Isaak to MarkE    |
|    Re: Student of Stanley Miller comments o    |
|    01 Sep 25 22:16:31    |
      From: specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net              On 8/29/25 5:41 PM, MarkE wrote:       > On 29/08/2025 1:53 am, Mark Isaak wrote:       >> On 8/23/25 6:06 AM, MarkE wrote:       >>> On 22/08/2025 11:19 pm, RonO wrote:       >       >>>       >>> Ron, this post is not about the Bible or any particular       >>> interpretation of it. The interview cited is only science.       >>> Ironically, your bluster and misdirection serve to "deny the science".       >>       >> How do you reconcile your views with theism? You're effectively       >> telling god what god can and cannot do. In my view, that means       >> placing yourself above God, which demotes God to non-god status.       >>       >       > My approach is to avoid conflating science and theology. Therefore, I       > generally discuss the science only. My theological beliefs are not       > relevant to interpreting science.       >       > All the same, I'm happy to discuss my faith and have done so here. So to       > reiterate my approach:       >       > In my opinion, growing scientific understanding of the functional       > complexity of even minimal life is leading to deepening problems with       > abiogenesis. As a consequence, consideration of a supernatural       > explanation becomes increasingly warranted as a rational response to       > scientific evidence.       >       > It's not an either/or; it's not a suggestion to abandon science. Keep       > doing science, but don't rule out supernatural explanation. Moreover, do       > so with these in mind:       >       > - don't be too hasty to appeal to the supernatural -- that is the god-       > of-the-gaps error;       > - recognise the boundary of science, i.e. that science cannot, by       > definition, tell us anything about a hypothesised supernatural cause.       >       > Some will only consider natural explanations because science has no       > access to the supernatural, or an erroneous belief that science is the       > only possible source of knowledge. That's akin to a child putting their       > hands over their eyes and declaring you can't see them.              So when a natural explanation for abiogenesis is found, God goes poof?              --       Mark Isaak       "Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That       doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca