Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,393 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to sticks    |
|    Re: Recalling Karl Crawford (2/2)    |
|    03 Sep 25 16:11:08    |
      [continued from previous message]              never be able to scientifically address. This is why ID perps like       Denton just claim that his designer got the ball rolling with the Big       Bang and the rest could have unfolded into what we have. The       "information" that you claim is required to build things isn't a factor       for the origin of life nor the subsequent evolution of life on earth.       Denton understands that your "information" is not required. He claims       that the initial conditions set things up to unfold. This is because       the "information" needed is not like a computer program or the planning       needed to manufacture a V8 engine.              The original information needed to create the first self replicating       molecules would have been just chemistry. Once you have a self       replicator that replicates imperfectly evolution can start. Any random       mistake might result in some new function, but it has to work within the       boundaries of what is already working or the molecule does not       replicate. Failures do not replicate, so what you are left with are the       successes. The original lifeform that might have been called a single       cell still exists in all the extant lifeforms. It isn't just DNA       transferred between generations, but functioning cells have to hold the       next generations genetic material. For multicellular lifeforms they all       have to develop from the single functioning cells that contain the next       generations genetics. This means that you do not need a plan and       mechanics like you need to make a V8 engine. What happens is the       constant testing of genetic changes by the existing environment. Each       change has to work within what is already working or it is lost. What       we observe are lifeforms evolving by such incremental functioning       changes. What we observe is not new designs, but additions to what is       already working. Even if there was a plan or design that was being       followed it would have to be implemented in this way because descent       with modification is just a fact of nature. ID perps like Denton       understand this to be true.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca