Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,436 of 142,579    |
|    RonO to RonO    |
|    Re: New cases of H5N1 (2/2)    |
|    06 Sep 25 18:13:27    |
      [continued from previous message]              like the California strain came from outer space. The GISAID phylogeny       is likely wrong. The root node associating the dairy virus with the       B3.13 genotype is associated with the texas dairy lineage, but that may       be due to the use of the human infection A/Texas/37/2024 that has always       been known to be a sequence outlier and possible recombinant. What they       need to do is redo the phylogenetic analysis without the A/Texas/37/2024       sequence. From the branch lengths of the divergence phylogeny it looks       like the root may be closer to or within the California sequences.              The USDA has to start doing the epidemiological analysis of their       sequences that they should have been doing from day one. They need to       inform the states that have reinfected herds of what Genotype of the       virus is infecting their herds and they have to start determining where       that virus is coming from. They obviously need to keep the virus from       spreading from California when the movement of animals is already       restricted. They have to restrict dairy worker movements unless they       have tested negative for the virus.              https://gisaid.org/phylogeny-influenza/hpai-h5n1-usa/              The GISAID have removed the Washington poultry worker, the Wyoming farm       worker, and the Nevada dairy worker from their D1.1 phylogeny. All       three had been infected with the same lineage of the D1.1 virus. The       Washington poultry worker had been infected in Oct and was likely part       of the second group of poultry workers 3 of whom were detected after       they left the state and were in Oregon, so infected workers had       obviously left the state, and it looks like one or more of them went to       Wyoming and/or Nevada. Those sequence were removed for some reason and       GISAID is not giving any explanation. The epidemiological analysis has       never been done, and the Nevada dairy workers movements were not       restricted and Arizona got infected with the Nevada virus. They did not       restrict dairy worker movements even though they knew that at least one       Nevada dairy worker had been infected that worked at an infected dairy.       The CDC and USDA has always only recommended that dairy workers on       infected farms not go to other farms, and that recommendation obviously       does not apply to herds that are not yet known to be infected. It sounds       like 23 states are no longer testing their herds even though some states       are being reinfected.              The epidemic is supposed to be winding down, but it looks like another       round of reinfections is starting. Colorado, Minn. and Iowa are       supposed to have reinfected herds, but they aren't doing the       epidemiology to find out where the virus is coming from. They aren't       even counting them as infected herds.              Ron Okimoto              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca