Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    talk.origins    |    Evolution versus creationism (sometimes    |    142,579 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 141,457 of 142,579    |
|    Mark Isaak to MarkE    |
|    Re: Mapping the Origins Debate    |
|    08 Sep 25 11:55:30    |
      From: specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net              On 9/6/25 7:23 AM, MarkE wrote:       > [big snip]              > What if science itself identifies non-causal phenomena? Now, if I       > understand correctly, you are saying this can never happen; rather, what       > may appear to be non-causal can only be categorised as "currently       > unexplained naturally".       >       > This is the nub of the issue I think. You seem to have upfront excluded       > epistemologies apart from science (as good as it is). This provides a       > jusfication to leave it at "currently unexplained naturally" rather than       > considering supernatural explanation, because you assume that there is       > no other legitimate means of acquiring knowledge, and the best we can do       > is park it in the science baskets of "to do" or "too hard" (which takes       > us back to 1 above).              Okay, for sake of argument, let us suppose you have identified something       as non-causal, or even unambiguously supernatural.              Then what?               From a scientific standpoint, you're at a dead end. The main strength       of science is that it lets us make predictions, but you can't do that       with supernatural. Science also typically opens up further areas for       investigation, but here, instead, you're closing them.              Theology isn't helped, either. "Supernatural" does not tell you anything       about the supernatural "cause" either. (In fact, per our premise, there       was no cause.) Even if you take a leap of faith and say "God did it,"       you (or maybe everyone else besides you) are left with the question,       which god?              As far as I can see, there are two reasons why someone might want       supernatural explanations. The first is that they might be popular for       the same reason that postmodernism was popular: you get to make up       bullshit, free from all constraints, that a few other people might even       find impressive. The second is that hostile foreign powers might       encourage it as a way to sabotage a nation's economy and power.              --       Mark Isaak       "Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That       doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca